2017 Legal and Judicial Ethics, Q12

Atty. Simplicio published the following advertisement in a local newspaper: “Annulment of Marriage, Competent Attorney, Reasonable Fees, Call 221-2345.”
A Justice of the Supreme Court saw the advertisement and thereafter called the attention of his colleagues. The Supreme Court directed the Bar Confidant investigate the matter. When directed to explain why no disciplinary action should be taken against him for the improper advertisement, Atty. Simplicio contended that: (a) the advertisement was not improper because his name was not mentioned; and (b) he could not be subjected to disciplinary action because there was no complaint filed against him.
Rule on Atty. Simplicio’s contentions. (4%)

Quick check

Is a newspaper advertisement soliciting "Annulment of Marriage" with "Reasonable Fees" ethically permissible for a lawyer?

May the Supreme Court initiate disciplinary proceedings against an attorney without a formal complaint filed by a private party?

Under Khan v. Simbillo, why is commercial advertising of legal services prohibited under Philippine legal ethics?

Does omitting a lawyer's name from a published legal advertisement render the advertisement ethical?

Choices available with full access.

What is the primary role of the Office of the Bar Confidant in Supreme Court disciplinary investigations?

Choices available with full access.

Unlock the full Remedial Law answers

Learn more about these topics

1. Prohibited Legal Advertising
Under Canon II, Section 17 of the Code of Professional Responsibility and Accountability (CPRA) and settled jurisprudence (Khan v. Simbillo), soliciting legal business through commercial advertisements in newspapers, directories, or media is strictly prohibited. The practice of law is a noble profession and a form of public service, not a commercial trade or ordinary business enterprise. Omitting the lawyer's personal name from a published advertisement does not cure its improper nature, as the advertisement still seeks to commercialize legal services.

2. Motu Proprio Discipline
Under Canon VI of the CPRA and the inherent constitutional authority of the Supreme Court, disciplinary proceedings against members of the bar may be initiated motu proprio by the Court. The Supreme Court possesses plenary administrative authority to supervise, investigate, and discipline erring attorneys without requiring a formal verified complaint from a private litigant. A report or observation by a Supreme Court Justice is a valid basis for the Bar Confidant to conduct a formal investigation.

3. Commercialization of Law
Advertising legal services with promises of reasonable fees and quick annulment results degrades the legal profession by treating legal representation as a commercial commodity. Law is a profession dedicated to the administration of justice and public interest rather than money-making. Consequently, self-laudatory advertisements or indirect solicitations of legal cases undermine public trust in the judicial system and subject the responsible attorney to appropriate administrative sanction.

About these questions and answers
The questions reproduced here are the official texts of the Philippine Bar Examinations, published by the Supreme Court. They are reproduced for study purposes.The suggested answers are the author’s own.

They are not official answers, have no connection with the Supreme Court, the Office of the Bar Confidant, or any bar review institution, and are not endorsed by any of them. Official answer keys, where released, should be preferred over anything here.Nothing on this page is legal advice, and reading it creates no lawyer-client relationship. Do not rely on any suggested answer in an actual legal matter. Consult counsel on your own facts.Suggested answers reflect the law and jurisprudence the author considers applicable as of the date shown.

Where a question comes from an earlier examination, the suggested answer applies the law as it now stands, which may differ from the law in force when the question was given, and may therefore differ from what would have been the correct answer at that time. Where the difference is material, the answer notes it.The practice scoring feature measures wording overlap with the suggested answer. It is not a grade, carries no official weight, and says nothing about whether your reasoning is sound.Errors are possible. If you find one, please tell me and I will correct it.Last reviewed: October 2026