A. One of Pacific Airline’s policies was to hire only single applicants as flight attendants, and considered as automatically resigned the flight attendants at the moment they got married. Is the policy valid? Explain your answer. (2.5%)
B. Tarcisio was employed as operations manager and received a monthly salary of ₱25,000.00 through his payroll account with DB Bank. He obtained a loan from Roberto to purchase a car. Tarcisio failed to pay Roberto when the loan fell due. Roberto sued to collect, and moved to garnish Tarcisio’s payroll account. The latter vigorously objected and argued that salaries were exempt from garnishment. Is Tarcisio correct? Explain your answer. (3%)
Suggested answer only. Not an official answer and not legal advice.
A. **No**, the policy is not valid. B. **No**, Tarcisio is not correct. Under Article 134 of the Labor Code, it is unlawful for an employer to require as a condition of employment that a woman worker shall not marry,
Unlock the full Labor Law answers365 days of full access. GCash, Maya and card accepted.
This is not an official scoring system and carries no weight with the Supreme Court or any bar review provider. It measures how much of the suggested answer's wording your response covers, not whether your reasoning is correct. For practice only.
Quick check
Is a company policy requiring flight attendants to remain single valid under the Labor Code?
Article 136 of the Labor Code renders void any employer stipulation requiring female employees to remain unmarried.
Under Gaa v. Court of Appeals, what form of compensation is exempt from garnishment under Article 1708 of the Civil Code?
Article 1708 of the Civil Code exempts only the wages of rank-and-file laborers from garnishment.
Can an operations manager successfully claim that his monthly payroll salary is exempt from debt garnishment?
Managerial salaries are not exempt from execution because Article 1708 applies solely to rank-and-file laborer wages.
What must an employer prove to justify a policy restricting marriage among its employees?
Choices available with full access.
How does Philippine labor law distinguish wages from managerial salaries regarding judicial garnishment?
Choices available with full access.
Learn more about these topics
1. Stipulation Against Marriage
Article 136 (formerly 134) of the Labor Code explicitly prohibits employers from requiring as a condition of employment that a woman worker shall not marry, or stipulating that upon marrying, she shall be deemed resigned or dismissed. Company policies establishing a blanket prohibition against marriage are inherently void for violating statutory law and public policy. Unless the employer proves that single status is a bona fide occupational qualification reasonably necessary for business operations, policies penalizing marriage constitute unlawful gender discrimination against female employees.
2. Garnishment of Wages
Under Article 1708 of the Civil Code, the statutory exemption of wages from execution or garnishment applies exclusively to rank-and-file laborers. Labor laws protect basic laborer wages to guarantee immediate family subsistence and basic living needs. However, judicial precedent, notably Gaa v. Court of Appeals, clarifies that higher compensation paid to managerial, supervisory, or executive personnel is classified as salary rather than wages. Consequently, the payroll accounts of managerial employees do not enjoy civil law exemption and remain legally subject to court garnishment.
3. Managerial Status Exception
The distinction between wages and salaries is critical in determining statutory exemptions from debt execution. While wages refer to compensation given for manual labor or skilled routine work performed by rank-and-file workers, salaries represent remuneration paid to managerial or executive employees holding positions of trust. Because managerial employees possess higher earning capacity and administrative responsibility, statutory protections shielding rank-and-file wages from judicial garnishment do not extend to managerial salaries in civil debt collection proceedings.