Tyler owns a lot that is enclosed by the lots of Riley to the North and East, of Dylan to the South, and of Reece to the West. The current route to the public highway is a kilometer’s walk through the northern lot of Riley, but the route is a rough road that gets muddy during the rainy season, and is inconvenient because it is only 2.5 meters wide. Tyler’s nearest access to the public highway would be through the southern lot of Dylan.
May Dylan be legally required to afford to Tyler a right of way through his property? Explain your answer. (4%)
Suggested answer only. Not an official answer and not legal advice.
No, Dylan may not be legally required to afford Tyler a right of way through his property. Under Article 649 of the Civil Code, a compulsory easement of right of way requires that the dominant estate be isolated
Unlock the full Civil Law answers365 days of full access. GCash, Maya and card accepted.
This is not an official scoring system and carries no weight with the Supreme Court or any bar review provider. It measures how much of the suggested answer's wording your response covers, not whether your reasoning is correct. For practice only.
Quick check
Under Article 649 of the Civil Code, what is the primary requisite for compelling a neighboring landowner to grant a right of way?
Article 649 requires that the dominant estate be enclosed and lacking an adequate outlet to a public highway.
How does Philippine civil law treat a situation where an existing outlet to a public highway is inconvenient, rough, or narrow?
Mere inconvenience or difficulty of an existing outlet does not justify a compulsory right of way.
Under Article 650 of the Civil Code, how is the specific location of a compulsory right of way determined once necessity is established?
Article 650 provides that the easement shall be established at the point least prejudicial to the servient estate.
Why was Dylan NOT legally required to afford Tyler a right of way through his southern property?
Choices available with full access.
What obligation does the owner of a dominant estate have when demanding a compulsory easement of right of way?
Choices available with full access.
Learn more about these topics
1. Easement Requisites
Under Article 649 of the Civil Code, an owner of an enclosed estate may demand a compulsory easement of right of way only if the property is surrounded by other estates and without an adequate outlet to a public highway. The isolation must not be due to the dominant owner's own acts, and proper indemnity must be paid to the servient estate.
2. Outlet Adequacy
Philippine civil law strictly distinguishes between mere inconvenience and the legal inadequacy of an outlet. A right of way will not be granted merely because another route is shorter, more convenient, or less arduous. If an existing outlet allows access to a public highway, even if it is narrow, rough, or difficult during adverse weather conditions, the requirement of lack of an adequate outlet is not satisfied.
3. Least Prejudicial Route
Under Article 650 of the Civil Code, the easement of right of way shall be established at the point least prejudicial to the servient estate, and, insofar as consistent with this rule, where the distance from the dominant estate to a public highway may be the shortest. However, this rule applies only after establishing that the legal necessity for an easement exists due to the complete absence of an adequate outlet.