2016 Remedial Law, Q9

[a] Is the buyer in the auction sale arising from an extra-judicial foreclosure entitled to a writ of possession even before the expiration of the redemption period? If so, what is the action to be taken? (1 %)
[b] After the period of redemption has lapsed and the title to the lot is consolidated in the name of the auction buyer, is he entitled to the writ of possession as a matter of right? If so, what is the action to be taken? (2%)
[c] Suppose that after the title to the lot has been consolidated in the name of the auction buyer, said buyer sold the lot to a third party without first getting a writ of possession. Can the transferee exercise the right of the auction buyer and claim that it is a ministerial duty of the court to issue a writ of possession in his favor? Briefly explain. (2%)

Quick check

Under Section 7 of Act No. 3135, what is required for an auction purchaser to obtain a writ of possession during the redemption period?

What is the nature of the court's duty to issue a writ of possession after title is consolidated in the auction buyer?

If an auction purchaser sells the property to a third party after title consolidation, what right does the transferee acquire?

Which statute governs the extrajudicial foreclosure of real estate mortgages and the issuance of writs of possession in the Philippines?

Choices available with full access.

Why is an auction purchaser not required to post a bond when applying for a writ of possession after title consolidation?

Choices available with full access.

Unlock the full Remedial Law answers

Learn more about these topics

1. Possession Pending Redemption
Under Section 7 of Act No. 3135, the purchaser in an extrajudicial foreclosure sale may petition the court for a writ of possession during the one-year redemption period. To obtain the writ, the buyer must file an ex parte petition under oath and post a court-approved bond equal to the use and occupation value of the property for twelve months. The issuance of the writ during this stage is a judicial proceeding designed to protect both the purchaser's possessory claim and the mortgagor's redemption rights.

2. Consolidated Title Writ
Upon the expiration of the one-year redemption period without redemption being made, title to the foreclosed real property becomes consolidated in the auction purchaser. Once title is consolidated and a new certificate of title is issued, the purchaser's right to possession becomes absolute. At this stage, the issuance of a writ of possession turns into a purely ministerial duty of the court. The purchaser is no longer required to post a bond to obtain physical possession of the property.

3. Transferee Possessory Right
The right of an auction buyer to demand a writ of possession as a ministerial duty extends to subsequent transferees or buyers. When the purchaser sells or conveys the property after title consolidation, the transferee steps into the shoes of the purchaser, acquiring all associated rights and remedies. Consequently, the transferee may file an ex parte motion for the issuance of a writ of possession, and the court remains bound by its ministerial duty to grant the writ.

About these questions and answers
The questions reproduced here are the official texts of the Philippine Bar Examinations, published by the Supreme Court. They are reproduced for study purposes.The suggested answers are the author’s own.

They are not official answers, have no connection with the Supreme Court, the Office of the Bar Confidant, or any bar review institution, and are not endorsed by any of them. Official answer keys, where released, should be preferred over anything here.Nothing on this page is legal advice, and reading it creates no lawyer-client relationship. Do not rely on any suggested answer in an actual legal matter. Consult counsel on your own facts.Suggested answers reflect the law and jurisprudence the author considers applicable as of the date shown.

Where a question comes from an earlier examination, the suggested answer applies the law as it now stands, which may differ from the law in force when the question was given, and may therefore differ from what would have been the correct answer at that time. Where the difference is material, the answer notes it.The practice scoring feature measures wording overlap with the suggested answer. It is not a grade, carries no official weight, and says nothing about whether your reasoning is sound.Errors are possible. If you find one, please tell me and I will correct it.Last reviewed: October 2026