Under Section 5, Rule 113 a warrantless arrest is allowed when an offense has just been committed and the peace officer has probable cause to believe, based on his personal knowledge of facts or circumstances, that the person to be arrested has committed it. A policeman approaches you for advice and asks you how he will execute a warrantless arrest against a murderer who escaped after killing a person. The policeman arrived two (2) hours after the killing and a certain Max was allegedly the killer per information given by a witness. He asks you to clarify the following:
[a] How long after the commission of the crime can he still execute the warrantless arrest? (2.5%)
[b] What does “personal knowledge of the facts and circumstances that the person to be arrested committed it” mean? (2.5%)
Suggested answer only. Not an official answer and not legal advice.
In [a], the arrest must be made within an immediate timeframe after the crime. In [b], personal knowledge means facts indicating guilt were within the officer's actual perception or evaluation at the scene. Under Section 5(b), Rule 113 of
Unlock the full Remedial Law answers365 days of full access. GCash, Maya and card accepted.
This is not an official scoring system and carries no weight with the Supreme Court or any bar review provider. It measures how much of the suggested answer's wording your response covers, not whether your reasoning is correct. For practice only.
Quick check
What are the two essential requisites for a valid warrantless arrest under Section 5(b), Rule 113 of the Rules of Court?
Section 5(b) requires that the offense has just been committed and the officer has probable cause based on personal knowledge of facts.
What does the phrase 'has just been committed' signify in a hot pursuit warrantless arrest?
The phrase requires durational immediacy between the commission of the crime and the warrantless arrest.
What constitutes 'personal knowledge of facts' required of an officer executing a hot pursuit warrantless arrest?
Personal knowledge means the officer personally gathered and evaluated facts and circumstances at the crime scene.
If two hours have passed since a killing and officers have gathered scene facts and witness leads, may they execute a hot pursuit arrest?
Choices available with full access.
What is the legal consequence if an arrest is executed without a warrant and fails to satisfy any exception under Rule 113?
Choices available with full access.
Learn more about these topics
1. Hot Pursuit Requisites
Under Section 5(b), Rule 113 of the Rules of Court, a peace officer may effect a warrantless arrest under the doctrine of hot pursuit when an offense has just been committed and the arresting officer has probable cause to believe, based on personal knowledge of facts or circumstances, that the person to be arrested committed it. Compliance with both time immediacy and personal knowledge of facts is mandatory to ensure the constitutional validity of the warrantless arrest.
2. Time Immediacy Requirement
The requirement that an offense has just been committed requires durational immediacy between the commission of the crime and the warrantless arrest. While the rules do not set a fixed hourly limit, the arrest must occur without an appreciable time gap that breaks the continuity of the pursuit. If a significant period elapses allowing investigation, the urgency ceases, and law enforcement officers are legally required to obtain a judicial warrant of arrest before apprehending the suspect.
3. Personal Knowledge Scope
Personal knowledge of facts and circumstances does not require that the arresting officer personally witnessed the actual commission of the crime. Instead, it means that the officer personally gathered and evaluated physical evidence, witness statements, or scene circumstances directly at the crime scene shortly after the offense. Probable cause must be anchored on reasonable grounds derived from actual investigation rather than raw hearsay, unverified tips, or mere suspicion.