2016 Mercantile Law, Q14

X, a government official, has a number of bank accounts in T Bank containing millions of pesos. He also opened several trust accounts in the same bank which specifically covered the placement and/or investment of funds. X was later charged with graft and corruption before the Sandiganbayan (SB) by the Ombudsman. The Special Prosecutor filed a motion praying for a court order authorizing it to look into the savings and trust accounts of X in T Bank. X opposed the motion arguing that the trust accounts are not “deposits” under the Law on Secrecy of Bank Deposits (Rep. Act No. 1405). Is the contention of X correct? Explain. (5%)

Quick check

Does the statutory term 'deposits' under Section 2 of Republic Act Number 1405 include bank trust accounts?

Can bank secrecy under Republic Act Number 1405 be invoked to prevent court inspection of trust accounts in graft cases?

Which judicial body has authority to order the examination of bank and trust accounts of a public officer charged with graft?

Under Ejercito versus Sandiganbayan, why are trust accounts placed in banks covered by Republic Act Number 1405?

Choices available with full access.

Which primary statute protects the confidentiality of bank deposits and investments in the Philippines?

Choices available with full access.

Unlock the full Commercial and Tax Law answers

Learn more about these topics

1. Broad Deposit Definition
Under Section 2 of Republic Act Number 1405, otherwise known as the Law on Secrecy of Bank Deposits, the term deposit is understood in its broad and generic sense. It includes deposits of whatever nature with banks or banking institutions in the Philippines, encompassing funds placed in trust accounts and financial investments. In Ejercito v. Sandiganbayan, the Supreme Court clarified that funds held in trust accounts fall under the protective umbrella of Republic Act Number 1405 because they involve money deposited with a banking institution for safekeeping or investment.

2. Anti Graft Exception
Under Philippine bank secrecy jurisprudence and statutory law, bank accounts and trust funds are not absolutely immune from judicial inquiry. Where an official or individual is prosecuted for violation of the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act (Republic Act Number 3019) or for unexplained wealth under Republic Act Number 1379, bank deposit secrecy yields to court authority. In graft cases pending before the Sandiganbayan, competent courts are fully empowered to issue orders allowing prosecutors to examine bank savings, checking, and trust accounts of public officers.

3. Judicial Examination Scope
Under Section 2 of Republic Act Number 1405, bank secrecy cannot be invoked when the money deposited or invested is the subject matter of litigation. In bribery, graft, or unexplained wealth proceedings against public officials, the funds stored in bank and trust accounts constitute the core subject matter of the criminal action. Consequently, an order issued by the Sandiganbayan authorizing the prosecution to inspect trust accounts does not violate Republic Act Number 1405, as the statutory exceptions explicitly permit inspection in cases of court-ordered graft investigations.

About these questions and answers
The questions reproduced here are the official texts of the Philippine Bar Examinations, published by the Supreme Court. They are reproduced for study purposes.The suggested answers are the author’s own.

They are not official answers, have no connection with the Supreme Court, the Office of the Bar Confidant, or any bar review institution, and are not endorsed by any of them. Official answer keys, where released, should be preferred over anything here.Nothing on this page is legal advice, and reading it creates no lawyer-client relationship. Do not rely on any suggested answer in an actual legal matter. Consult counsel on your own facts.Suggested answers reflect the law and jurisprudence the author considers applicable as of the date shown.

Where a question comes from an earlier examination, the suggested answer applies the law as it now stands, which may differ from the law in force when the question was given, and may therefore differ from what would have been the correct answer at that time. Where the difference is material, the answer notes it.The practice scoring feature measures wording overlap with the suggested answer. It is not a grade, carries no official weight, and says nothing about whether your reasoning is sound.Errors are possible. If you find one, please tell me and I will correct it.Last reviewed: October 2026