2016 Labor Law, Q1

What are the requisites of a valid quitclaim? (5%)

Quick check

Which of the following is NOT a required element for a deed of release, waiver, and quitclaim to be held legally valid?

Who bears the burden of proving that a quitclaim was voluntarily executed for a fair and reasonable consideration?

What is the legal effect of a quitclaim executed in exchange for an unconscionably low consideration?

Which factor vitiates the voluntariness of consent in the execution of a quitclaim?

Under Philippine jurisprudence, when is a quitclaim considered binding and enforceable against an employee?

Learn more about these topics

1. Quitclaim Requisites
A deed of release, waiver, or quitclaim is valid and legally binding when executed voluntarily with full understanding of its consequences. To stand judicial scrutiny, there must be no fraud, deceit, or coercion on either party. Furthermore, the consideration paid must be credible, fair, and reasonable, and the stipulations must not be contrary to law, morals, good customs, public order, or public policy. When these elements concur, the quitclaim operates as a final compromise settlement.

2. Burden of Proof
In labor controversies where the employer raises a quitclaim as a defense against monetary claims or illegal dismissal, the burden of proof rests on the employer. Management must establish with substantial evidence that the agreement was signed voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently by the employee. The employer must also demonstrate that the monetary consideration provided represents a fair and reasonable compromise. If the employer fails to discharge this evidentiary burden, the release is deemed void and ineffective.

3. Unconscionable Consideration
Quitclaims executed in exchange for unconscionably low or negligible consideration are void for being contrary to public policy. While Philippine labor law does not prescribe a fixed mathematical percentage to measure adequacy, courts evaluate reasonableness on a case-by-case basis. If the amount paid is ridiculously low compared to the employee's full statutory entitlements, or if the worker was compelled to accept it out of dire financial necessity, the quitclaim will not bar the employee from recovering the remaining balance.

About these questions and answers
The questions reproduced here are the official texts of the Philippine Bar Examinations, published by the Supreme Court. They are reproduced for study purposes.The suggested answers are the author’s own.

They are not official answers, have no connection with the Supreme Court, the Office of the Bar Confidant, or any bar review institution, and are not endorsed by any of them. Official answer keys, where released, should be preferred over anything here.Nothing on this page is legal advice, and reading it creates no lawyer-client relationship. Do not rely on any suggested answer in an actual legal matter. Consult counsel on your own facts.Suggested answers reflect the law and jurisprudence the author considers applicable as of the date shown.

Where a question comes from an earlier examination, the suggested answer applies the law as it now stands, which may differ from the law in force when the question was given, and may therefore differ from what would have been the correct answer at that time. Where the difference is material, the answer notes it.The practice scoring feature measures wording overlap with the suggested answer. It is not a grade, carries no official weight, and says nothing about whether your reasoning is sound.Errors are possible. If you find one, please tell me and I will correct it.Last reviewed: October 2026