2016 Criminal Law, Q19

Romeo and Julia have been married for twelve (12) years and had two (2) children. The first few years of their marriage went along smoothly. However, on the fifth year onwards, they would often quarrel when Romeo comes home drunk. The quarrels became increasingly violent, marked by quiet periods when Julia would leave the conjugal dwelling. During these times of quiet, Romeo would “court” Julia with flowers and chocolate and convince her to return home, telling her that he could not live without her; or Romeo would ask Julia to forgive him, which she did, believing that if she humbled herself, Romeo would change. After a month of marital bliss, Romeo would return to his drinking habit and the quarrel would start again, verbally at first, until it would escalate to physical violence.
One night, Romeo came home drunk and went straight to bed. Fearing the onset of another violent fight, Julia stabbed Romeo while he was asleep. A week later, their neighbors discovered Romeo’s rotting corpse on the marital bed. Julia and the children were nowhere to be found. Julia was charged with parricide. She asserted “battered woman’s syndrome” as her defense.
[a] Explain the “cycle of violence.” (2.5%)
[b] Is Julia’s “battered woman’s syndrome” defense meritorious? Explain. (2.5%)

Quick check

What are the three distinct phases comprising the 'cycle of violence' in intimate partner abuse under RA 9262?

What is the legal effect when a woman suffering from Battered Woman Syndrome kills her abusive spouse under Section 26 of RA 9262?

How many battering cycles must be established under People v. Genosa to substantiate the defense of Battered Woman Syndrome?

Why is Julia's stabbing of her sleeping husband Romeo justified under the defense of Battered Woman Syndrome?

Choices available with full access.

What evidence is crucial to substantiate that a defendant was suffering from Battered Woman Syndrome at the time of the offense?

Choices available with full access.

Unlock the full Criminal Law answers

Learn more about these topics

1. Cycle of Violence
Under Republic Act No. 9262, or the Anti-Violence Against Women and Their Children Act of 2004, the cycle of violence characterizes the psychological pattern of abusive relationships through three recurring phases: the tension-building phase, the acute battering incident, and the tranquil or honeymoon phase. In the tension-building phase, minor verbal or physical abuse occurs. The acute battering phase involves severe, uncontrollable violence. The tranquil phase follows, where the batterer exhibits remorse, affection, and promises of change. This recurring pattern creates cumulative psychological trauma and helplessness in the victim.

2. Battered Woman Syndrome
Battered Woman Syndrome refers to a scientifically recognized pattern of psychological and behavioral symptoms developing in women who experience sustained physical, sexual, or psychological abuse by an intimate partner. Under Section 26 of RA 9262, victim-survivors suffering from Battered Woman Syndrome do not incur criminal or civil liability, notwithstanding the absence of any of the elements of self-defense under the Revised Penal Code. The psychological state resulting from repeated battering cycles induces a state of learned helplessness and persistent fear of imminent danger, justifying the woman's actions even during periods of apparent tranquility or sleep.

3. Requisites of Defense
Under Philippine jurisprudence established in People v. Genosa and codified in RA 9262, to successfully invoke Battered Woman Syndrome as a complete defense, the defense must establish at least two battering cycles between the batterer and the victim. Each cycle must consist of the tension-building, acute battering, and tranquil or honeymoon phases. Expert psychiatric or psychological testimony is required to prove that the victim was suffering from Battered Woman Syndrome at the time of the offense, thereby establishing that her perception of danger was impaired by cumulative psychological trauma.

About these questions and answers
The questions reproduced here are the official texts of the Philippine Bar Examinations, published by the Supreme Court. They are reproduced for study purposes.The suggested answers are the author’s own.

They are not official answers, have no connection with the Supreme Court, the Office of the Bar Confidant, or any bar review institution, and are not endorsed by any of them. Official answer keys, where released, should be preferred over anything here.Nothing on this page is legal advice, and reading it creates no lawyer-client relationship. Do not rely on any suggested answer in an actual legal matter. Consult counsel on your own facts.Suggested answers reflect the law and jurisprudence the author considers applicable as of the date shown.

Where a question comes from an earlier examination, the suggested answer applies the law as it now stands, which may differ from the law in force when the question was given, and may therefore differ from what would have been the correct answer at that time. Where the difference is material, the answer notes it.The practice scoring feature measures wording overlap with the suggested answer. It is not a grade, carries no official weight, and says nothing about whether your reasoning is sound.Errors are possible. If you find one, please tell me and I will correct it.Last reviewed: October 2026