2016 Civil Law, Q15

Peter and Paul entered into a Contract to Sell whereby Peter, the lot owner, agreed to sell to Paul his lot on November 6, 2016 for the price of Pl ,000,000.00 to be paid at the residence of Peter in Makati City at 1 :00 p.m. If the full price is paid in cash at the specified time and place, then Peter will execute a Deed of Absolute Sale and deliver the title to Paul.
On November 6, 2016, Paul did not show up and was not heard of from that date on. In view of the nonperformance by Paul of his obligation, Peter sent a letter to Paul that he is expressly and extra-judicially declaring the Contract to Sell rescinded and of no legal and binding effect. Peter further stated that failure on the part of Paul to contest the rescission within thirty (30) days from receipt of said letter shall mean that the latter agreed to the rescission.
Paul did not reply to this letter for five (5) years. Thus, Peter decided to sell his lot to Henry in 2021. After hearing that Henry bought the lot, Paul now questions the sale of the lot to Henry and files a complaint for nullification of the sale.
[a] Is the exercise by Peter of his power to rescind extra-judicially the Contract to Sell the proper and legal way of rescinding said contract? Explain. (2.5%)
[b] In case Paul made a downpayment pursuant to a stipulation in the Contract to Sell, what is the legal remedy of Peter? (2.5%)

Quick check

In a contract to sell real property, what is the legal effect of the buyer's failure to pay the purchase price on the agreed date?

Under the doctrine in UP v. De Los Angeles, how may a seller cancel a contract to sell upon the buyer's default?

What is the general rule regarding downpayments received by a seller upon extrajudicial cancellation of a contract to sell?

Why was Peter's sale of the lot to Henry in 2021 valid despite Paul's prior contract to sell?

Choices available with full access.

Which Civil Code principle prohibits a seller from retaining a buyer's downpayment after extrajudicially cancelling a contract to sell without a forfeiture clause?

Choices available with full access.

Unlock the full Civil Law answers

Learn more about these topics

1. Contract to Sell
In a contract to sell, ownership is reserved by the vendor and is not to pass until full payment of the purchase price. The payment of the price is a positive suspensive condition, the failure of which is not a breach of contract but an event that prevents the obligation of the vendor to convey title from becoming effective. Non-payment does not create a right to rescind under Article 1191 of the Civil Code, but rather renders the contract to sell ineffective and gives the vendor the right to cancel the agreement.

2. Extrajudicial Contract Cancellation
Under settled Philippine civil law and the doctrine established in UP v. De Los Angeles, a party may extrajudicially cancel or rescind a contract for non-performance without prior judicial intervention. When a contract to sell explicitly allows or when the buyer fails to fulfill the positive suspensive condition of full payment, the seller may extrajudicially declare the contract cancelled. While the buyer may question the cancellation in court, the extrajudicial declaration produces legal effect unless overturned by final judicial decree.

3. Downpayment Refund Remedy
Upon the valid extrajudicial cancellation of a contract to sell real property, the seller is obligated to return to the buyer any downpayment or installments received, unless there is a valid stipulation for forfeiture. In the absence of an express forfeiture clause, retaining the downpayment constitutes unjust enrichment under Article 22 of the Civil Code. Therefore, the seller's proper remedy is to extrajudicially cancel the contract and return the downpayment to the defaulting buyer.

About these questions and answers
The questions reproduced here are the official texts of the Philippine Bar Examinations, published by the Supreme Court. They are reproduced for study purposes.The suggested answers are the author’s own.

They are not official answers, have no connection with the Supreme Court, the Office of the Bar Confidant, or any bar review institution, and are not endorsed by any of them. Official answer keys, where released, should be preferred over anything here.Nothing on this page is legal advice, and reading it creates no lawyer-client relationship. Do not rely on any suggested answer in an actual legal matter. Consult counsel on your own facts.Suggested answers reflect the law and jurisprudence the author considers applicable as of the date shown.

Where a question comes from an earlier examination, the suggested answer applies the law as it now stands, which may differ from the law in force when the question was given, and may therefore differ from what would have been the correct answer at that time. Where the difference is material, the answer notes it.The practice scoring feature measures wording overlap with the suggested answer. It is not a grade, carries no official weight, and says nothing about whether your reasoning is sound.Errors are possible. If you find one, please tell me and I will correct it.Last reviewed: October 2026