2015 Taxation Law, Q16

LLL is a government instrumentality created by Executive Order to be primarily responsible for integrating and directing all reclamation projects for the National Government. It was not organized as a stock or a non-stock corporation, nor was it intended to operate commercially and compete in the private market.
By virtue of its mandate, LLL reclaimed several portions of the foreshore and offshore areas of the Manila Bay, some of which were within the territorial jurisdiction of Q City. Certificates of title to the reclaimed properties in Q City were issued in the name of LLL in 2008. In 2014, Q City issued Warrants of Levy on said reclaimed properties of LLL based on the assessment for delinquent property taxes for the years 2010 to 2013.
a. Are the reclaimed properties registered in the name of LLL subject to real property tax? (4 % )
b. Will your answer be the same in (a) if from 2010 to the present time, LLL is leasing portions of the reclaimed properties for the establishment and use of popular fastfood restaurants J Burgers, G Pizza, and K Chicken? (2%)

Quick check

Are reclaimed lands registered under a non-stock government reclamation instrumentality subject to real property tax?

What principle determines the taxability of government-owned real property leased to private commercial entities?

Which landmark Supreme Court decision affirmed that the Philippine Reclamation Authority is a tax-exempt government instrumentality?

What is the legal status of warrants of levy issued by a city on tax-exempt reclaimed lands of the public domain?

Choices available with full access.

Who is liable for real property tax when a government instrumentality leases its land to a private fast-food restaurant?

Choices available with full access.

Unlock the full Commercial and Tax Law answers

Learn more about these topics

1. Government Instrumentality Exemption
Under Section 234(a) of the Local Government Code, real property owned by the Republic of the Philippines or any of its political subdivisions is exempt from real property tax. In Philippine Reclamation Authority versus City of Paranaque, the Supreme Court ruled that a government instrumentality vested with corporate powers holding reclaimed lands of the public domain is exempt from local real property taxation. Because reclaimed foreshore lands form part of the public domain, certificates of title issued in the name of a non-stock, non-profit reclamation authority remain public property immune from local tax levies.

2. Beneficial Use Doctrine
Section 234(a) of the Local Government Code establishes the beneficial use doctrine, providing that real property owned by the Republic or a government instrumentality loses its tax exemption when beneficial use thereof has been granted, for consideration or otherwise, to a taxable person. When a government reclamation agency leases portions of its reclaimed real estate to private commercial entities such as fast-food restaurants, beneficial use passes to private taxable lessees. Consequently, the leased portions become subject to local real property tax assessed against the private occupants.

3. Public Domain Lands
Reclaimed foreshore and offshore areas form part of the inalienable public domain of the State intended for public use or public service. Under constitutional and statutory provisions, property of public dominion cannot be alienated, attached, or subjected to execution sales or tax warrants of levy by local government units. Unless explicitly reclassified as alienable and disposable land of the public domain by executive proclamation or statutory enactment, reclaimed lands held by a government instrumentality retain their public character and remain immune from administrative summary tax collection remedies.

About these questions and answers
The questions reproduced here are the official texts of the Philippine Bar Examinations, published by the Supreme Court. They are reproduced for study purposes.The suggested answers are the author’s own.

They are not official answers, have no connection with the Supreme Court, the Office of the Bar Confidant, or any bar review institution, and are not endorsed by any of them. Official answer keys, where released, should be preferred over anything here.Nothing on this page is legal advice, and reading it creates no lawyer-client relationship. Do not rely on any suggested answer in an actual legal matter. Consult counsel on your own facts.Suggested answers reflect the law and jurisprudence the author considers applicable as of the date shown.

Where a question comes from an earlier examination, the suggested answer applies the law as it now stands, which may differ from the law in force when the question was given, and may therefore differ from what would have been the correct answer at that time. Where the difference is material, the answer notes it.The practice scoring feature measures wording overlap with the suggested answer. It is not a grade, carries no official weight, and says nothing about whether your reasoning is sound.Errors are possible. If you find one, please tell me and I will correct it.Last reviewed: October 2026