2015 Labor Law, Q15

Victor was hired by a local manning agency as a seafarer cook on board a luxury vessel for an eight-month cruise. While on board, Victor complained of chronic coughing, intermittent fever, and joint pains. He was advised by the ship’s doctor to take complete bed rest but was not given any other medication. His condition persisted but the degree varied from day to day. At the end of the cruise, Victor went home to Iloilo and there had himself examined. The examination revealed that he had tuberculosis.
(a) Victor sued for medical reimbursement, damages and attorney’s fees, claiming that tuberculosis was a compensable illness. Do you agree with Victor? Why or why not? (2%)
(b) Due to his prolonged illness, Victor was unable to work for more than 120 days. Will this entitle him to claim total permanent disability benefits? (2%)

Quick check

Under the POEA-SEC, when is pulmonary tuberculosis considered a compensable occupational disease for a seafarer?

What is the legal effect of a seafarer's failure to undergo a post-employment medical examination by a company doctor within three working days upon return?

Why is seafarer Victor entitled to medical reimbursement despite failing to report within three working days?

Can a seafarer claim total permanent disability benefits based solely on being unable to work for more than 120 days?

Choices available with full access.

What exception excuses a seafarer from complying with the mandatory three-working-day reporting requirement after disembarkation?

Choices available with full access.

Unlock the full Labor Law answers

Learn more about these topics

1. Compensable Occupational Illness
Under Section 20(A) of the POEA Standard Employment Contract (POEA-SEC), work-related illnesses contracted or aggravated during the term of a seafarer's contract are compensable. Pulmonary tuberculosis is explicitly recognized as an occupational disease under the POEA-SEC. When symptoms manifest while on board the vessel and the nature of the sea duty or shipboard conditions contributed to the contraction or aggravation of the disease, the seafarer is entitled to medical reimbursement and related monetary compensation from the employer.

2. Mandatory Medical Examination
Section 20(A)(3) of the POEA-SEC mandates that a seafarer reporting for illness or injury must submit to a post-employment medical examination by a company-designated physician within three working days upon disembarkation. Compliance with this reporting requirement is a mandatory condition precedent for claiming disability benefits. Failure to comply, unless physically incapacitated, results in the forfeiture of the seafarer's right to claim total and permanent disability benefits, as it deprives the employer of the opportunity to evaluate the condition.

3. Permanent Disability Claims
Entitlement to total and permanent disability benefits is governed by the POEA-SEC and applicable labor rules, not by the mere passage of 120 or 240 days. While prolonged inability to work may indicate disability, a seafarer cannot claim statutory disability benefits if he fails to undergo the required post-employment medical examination within the statutory three-day period. Procedural compliance under the POEA-SEC remains essential, and non-compliance bars the award of permanent disability benefits despite severe or prolonged illness.

About these questions and answers
The questions reproduced here are the official texts of the Philippine Bar Examinations, published by the Supreme Court. They are reproduced for study purposes.The suggested answers are the author’s own.

They are not official answers, have no connection with the Supreme Court, the Office of the Bar Confidant, or any bar review institution, and are not endorsed by any of them. Official answer keys, where released, should be preferred over anything here.Nothing on this page is legal advice, and reading it creates no lawyer-client relationship. Do not rely on any suggested answer in an actual legal matter. Consult counsel on your own facts.Suggested answers reflect the law and jurisprudence the author considers applicable as of the date shown.

Where a question comes from an earlier examination, the suggested answer applies the law as it now stands, which may differ from the law in force when the question was given, and may therefore differ from what would have been the correct answer at that time. Where the difference is material, the answer notes it.The practice scoring feature measures wording overlap with the suggested answer. It is not a grade, carries no official weight, and says nothing about whether your reasoning is sound.Errors are possible. If you find one, please tell me and I will correct it.Last reviewed: October 2026