2014 Taxation Law, Q29

Doña Evelina, a rich widow engaged in the business of currency exchange, was assessed a considerable amount of local business taxes by the City Government of Bagnet by virtue of Tax Ordinance No. 24. Despite her objections thereto, Doña Evelina paid the taxes. Nevertheless, unsatisfied with said Tax Ordinance, Doña Evelina, through her counsel Atty. ELP, filed a written claim for recovery of said local business taxes and contested the assessment. Her claim was denied, and so Atty. ELP elevated her case to the Regional Trial Court (RTC).
The RTC declared Tax Ordinance No. 24 null and void and without legal effect for having been enacted in violation of the public ation requirement of tax ordinances and revenue measures under the Local Government Code (LGC) and on the ground of double taxation. On appeal, the Court of Tax Appeals (CTA) affirmed the decision of the RTC. No motion for reconsideration was filed and the decision became final and executory. (4%)
(A) If you are Atty. ELP, what advice will you give Doña Evelina so that she can recover the subject local business taxes?
(B) If Doña Evelina eventually recovers the local business taxes, must the same be considered as income taxable by the national government?

Quick check

What is the appropriate procedural remedy to recover local business taxes after a CTA decision voiding a tax ordinance becomes final and executory?

Under Section 34(C)(1) of the NIRC, how is a tax refund treated for income tax purposes under the tax benefit rule?

Why is a local business tax ordinance declared null and void if it fails to meet statutory publication requirements?

If a taxpayer did not claim a refunded local business tax as a deduction in previous tax returns, is the refund taxable?

Choices available with full access.

Which government entity has statutory authority to issue a writ of execution for a final tax refund judgment?

Choices available with full access.

Unlock the full Commercial and Tax Law answers

Learn more about these topics

1. Execution of Judgment
When a judgment of the Court of Tax Appeals declaring a local tax ordinance null and void becomes final and executory, the prevailing taxpayer cannot obtain an automatic cash refund without procedural enforcement. The appropriate legal remedy is to file a motion for execution before the court of origin or the CTA pursuant to its revised rules of procedure. Execution compels the local treasurer to refund the unconstitutionally collected local business taxes from municipal funds.

2. Tax Benefit Rule
Under Section 34(C)(1) of the National Internal Revenue Code, local taxes paid or accrued within the taxable year in connection with the taxpayer's trade or business are allowable deductions from gross income. However, under the tax benefit rule, if a previously deducted local business tax is subsequently refunded or credited, the amount recovered must be included as part of gross income in the taxable year of receipt to the extent of the income tax benefit derived from the prior deduction.

3. Local Business Tax
Local government units possess delegated authority to levy local business taxes under the Local Government Code. However, tax ordinances must comply with mandatory statutory requirements, including mandatory publication and constitutional limits against double taxation. When a tax ordinance is declared void ab initio for non-compliance with statutory publication requirements, all tax collections executed under the invalid ordinance lack legal foundation and are subject to full recovery by the aggrieved taxpayer.

About these questions and answers
The questions reproduced here are the official texts of the Philippine Bar Examinations, published by the Supreme Court. They are reproduced for study purposes.The suggested answers are the author’s own.

They are not official answers, have no connection with the Supreme Court, the Office of the Bar Confidant, or any bar review institution, and are not endorsed by any of them. Official answer keys, where released, should be preferred over anything here.Nothing on this page is legal advice, and reading it creates no lawyer-client relationship. Do not rely on any suggested answer in an actual legal matter. Consult counsel on your own facts.Suggested answers reflect the law and jurisprudence the author considers applicable as of the date shown.

Where a question comes from an earlier examination, the suggested answer applies the law as it now stands, which may differ from the law in force when the question was given, and may therefore differ from what would have been the correct answer at that time. Where the difference is material, the answer notes it.The practice scoring feature measures wording overlap with the suggested answer. It is not a grade, carries no official weight, and says nothing about whether your reasoning is sound.Errors are possible. If you find one, please tell me and I will correct it.Last reviewed: October 2026