Tom Wallis filed with the Regional Trial Court (RTC) a Petition for Declaration of Nullity of his marriage with Debi Wallis on the ground of psychological incapacity of the latter. Before filing the petition, Tom Wallis had told Debi Wallis that he wanted the annulment of their marriage because he was already fed up with her irrational and eccentric behaviour. However, in the petition for declaration of nullity of marriage, the correct residential address of Debi Wallis was deliberately not alleged and instead, the residential address of their married son was stated. Summons was served by substituted service at the address stated in the petition. For failure to file an answer, Debi Wallis was declared in default and Tom Wallis presented evidence ex-parte. The RTC rendered judgment declaring the marriage null and void on the ground of psychological incapacity of Debi Wallis. Three (3) years after the RTC judgment was rendered, Debi Wallis got hold of a copy thereof and wanted to have the RTC judgment reversed and set aside. If you are the lawyer of Debi Wallis, what judicial remedy or remedies will you take? Discuss and specify the ground or grounds for said remedy or remedies. (5%)
Suggested answer only. Not an official answer and not legal advice.
I will file a Petition for Annulment of Judgment under Rule 47 of the Rules of Court before the Court of Appeals. Under Rule 47, a final RTC judgment may be annulled based on extrinsic fraud or lack of jurisdiction over
Unlock the full Remedial Law answers365 days of full access. GCash, Maya and card accepted.
This is not an official scoring system and carries no weight with the Supreme Court or any bar review provider. It measures how much of the suggested answer's wording your response covers, not whether your reasoning is correct. For practice only.
Quick check
What is the proper judicial remedy before the Court of Appeals to annul a final RTC judgment obtained through extrinsic fraud?
Rule 47 provides the extraordinary remedy of annulment of an RTC judgment based on extrinsic fraud or lack of jurisdiction.
Within what period must a Rule 47 petition for annulment of judgment based on extrinsic fraud be filed?
Under Rule 47, an action for annulment of judgment based on extrinsic fraud must be filed within four years from discovery.
What type of fraud justifies the filing of a petition for annulment of judgment under Rule 47?
Only extrinsic fraud, which prevents a party from presenting a defense, is a valid ground under Rule 47.
Why is substituted service of summons at the residence of a married son invalid against a parent living elsewhere?
Choices available with full access.
What is the legal effect on a judgment when a trial court fails to acquire jurisdiction over the person of the defendant?
Choices available with full access.
Learn more about these topics
1. Rule 47 Annulment
Under Rule 47 of the Rules of Court, a petition for annulment of judgment is an extraordinary remedy available to set aside a final judgment of the Regional Trial Court. It may be grounded exclusively on extrinsic fraud or lack of jurisdiction. This remedy is available only when the ordinary remedies of new trial, appeal, petition for relief from judgment, or other appropriate remedies are no longer available through no fault of the petitioner, provided the petition is filed within the reglementary period.
2. Extrinsic Fraud Ground
Extrinsic fraud refers to any fraudulent scheme or act executed by the prevailing party outside of the trial which prevents the losing party from presenting a full and fair defense in court. Deliberately concealing the true residential address of the defendant in a petition to prevent service of summons constitutes extrinsic fraud. Under Rule 47, a petition for annulment based on extrinsic fraud must be filed before the Court of Appeals within four years from the discovery of the fraud.
3. Jurisdiction Over Person
Service of summons is the procedural means by which a trial court acquires jurisdiction over the person of the defendant in a civil action. Substituted service at an improper address or at the residence of a relative who does not reside with the defendant is invalid and ineffective. Where summons is not validly served and the defendant does not voluntarily appear, the judgment rendered by the trial court is null and void for lack of jurisdiction over the person.