2014 Remedial Law, Q18

A was charged with murder in the lower court. His Petition for Bail was denied after a summary hearing on the ground that the prosecution had established a strong evidence of guilt. No Motion for Reconsideration was filed from the denial of the Petition for Bail. During the reception of the evidence of the accused, the accused reiterated his petition for bail on the ground that the witnesses so far presented by the accused had shown that no qualifying aggravating circumstance attended the killing. The court denied the petition on the grounds that it had already ruled that: (i) the evidence of guilt is strong; (ii) the resolution for the Petition for Bail is solely based on the evidence presented by the prosecution; and (iii) no Motion for Reconsideration was filed from the denial of the Petition for Bail. (6%)
(A) If you are the Judge, how will you resolve the incident?
(B) Suppose the accused is convicted of the crime of homicide and the accused filed a Notice of Appeal, is he entitled to bail?

Quick check

Is an order denying a petition for bail final and unalterable throughout the criminal trial?

May the trial court consider defense evidence presented during trial to re-evaluate a prior denial of bail?

What is the effect of failing to file a motion for reconsideration from an initial order denying bail?

When an accused is convicted of homicide by the Regional Trial Court, is bail pending appeal a matter of right?

Choices available with full access.

Which circumstance justifies the denial of discretionary bail pending appeal after conviction for a non-capital offense?

Choices available with full access.

Unlock the full Remedial Law answers

Learn more about these topics

1. Interlocutory Bail
An order denying a petition for bail is interlocutory and does not become final or subject to res judicata. As the trial progresses and evidence for the defense is presented, the court may re-evaluate whether the evidence of guilt remains strong. If subsequent evidence presented by the accused rebuts or weakens the prosecution's evidence—such as disproving a qualifying aggravating circumstance—the court has the authority to reconsider and grant bail despite a prior denial.

2. Bail Evidence Scope
In determining whether the evidence of guilt is strong for a capital offense, the court must evaluate the overall state of the evidence, not exclusively the prosecution's evidence in isolation. Although the prosecution presents its evidence first during the initial summary bail hearing, the court cannot refuse to consider defense evidence presented later during trial that directly impacts the strength of the guilt determination. The failure to file a motion for reconsideration does not bar a subsequent application based on new evidence.

3. Discretionary Appeal Bail
Under Rule 114, Section 5 of the Rules of Court, bail after conviction by the Regional Trial Court for a non-capital offense such as homicide is discretionary. The appellate court or trial court may grant bail pending appeal, provided none of the bail-negating circumstances enumerated in the rules are present. These bail-negating circumstances include recidivism, habituality, flight risk, or commission of an offense while on probation or parole. In the absence of such circumstances, bail may be allowed.

About these questions and answers
The questions reproduced here are the official texts of the Philippine Bar Examinations, published by the Supreme Court. They are reproduced for study purposes.The suggested answers are the author’s own.

They are not official answers, have no connection with the Supreme Court, the Office of the Bar Confidant, or any bar review institution, and are not endorsed by any of them. Official answer keys, where released, should be preferred over anything here.Nothing on this page is legal advice, and reading it creates no lawyer-client relationship. Do not rely on any suggested answer in an actual legal matter. Consult counsel on your own facts.Suggested answers reflect the law and jurisprudence the author considers applicable as of the date shown.

Where a question comes from an earlier examination, the suggested answer applies the law as it now stands, which may differ from the law in force when the question was given, and may therefore differ from what would have been the correct answer at that time. Where the difference is material, the answer notes it.The practice scoring feature measures wording overlap with the suggested answer. It is not a grade, carries no official weight, and says nothing about whether your reasoning is sound.Errors are possible. If you find one, please tell me and I will correct it.Last reviewed: October 2026