2014 Remedial Law, Q12

Mary Jane met Shiela May at the recruitment agency where they both applied for overseas employment. They exchanged pleasantries, including details of their personal circumstances. Fortunately, Mary Jane was deployed to work as front desk receptionist at a hotel in Abu Dhabi where she met Sultan Ahmed who proposed marriage, to which she readily accepted. Unfortunately for Shiela May, she was not deployed to work abroad, and this made her envious of Mary Jane.
Mary Jane returned to the Philippines to prepare for her wedding. She secured from the National Statistics Office (NSO) a Certificate of No Marriage. It turned out from the NSO records that Mary Jane had previously contracted marriage with John Starr, a British citizen, which she never did. The purported marriage between Mary Jane and John Starr contained all the required pertinent details on Mary Jane. Mary Jane later on learned that Shiela May is the best friend of John Starr.
As a lawyer, Mary Jane seeks your advice on her predicament. What legal remedy will you avail to enable Mary Jane to contract marriage with Sultan Ahmed? (4%)

Quick check

What is the proper judicial remedy to expunge a registered marriage certificate where the petitioner's identity was fraudulently used in a simulated marriage?

Under the doctrine in Republic v. Olaybar, why is a petition for declaration of nullity of marriage inappropriate for a simulated marriage?

Who are the indispensable parties that must be impleaded in a Rule 108 petition to cancel a simulated marriage entry?

Which court has subject matter jurisdiction over a petition for cancellation of entry in the civil registry under Rule 108?

Choices available with full access.

What procedural requirement ensures that a Rule 108 proceeding for cancellation of entry is adversarial in nature?

Choices available with full access.

Unlock the full Remedial Law answers

Learn more about these topics

1. Rule 108 Proceedings
Under Rule 108 of the Rules of Court, a verified petition may be filed in the Regional Trial Court to cancel or correct entries in the civil registry, including simulated or void marriage records. Where a party never consented to nor participated in any marriage ceremony, the registered marriage certificate is a nullity. A Rule 108 petition provides the appropriate judicial mechanism to expunge fictitious records and restore the true civil status of the affected party, provided that all indispensable parties are properly impleaded.

2. Republic v. Olaybar
In Republic v. Olaybar, the Supreme Court ruled that a petition for cancellation of entry under Rule 108 is the proper remedy when a person's name and personal details were fraudulently used by an imposter to contract a simulated marriage. Because no real marriage ever took place between the actual parties, an action for declaration of nullity of marriage under Rule 47 or Article 36 is inappropriate. A Rule 108 proceeding effectively clears civil registry records upon proof of identity theft and non-participation.

3. Indispensable Parties Requirement
Rule 108 mandates an adversarial proceeding where all persons who have or claim any interest that would be affected by the cancellation or correction must be notified and impleaded. In a petition seeking to cancel a simulated marriage entry, the local civil registrar, the alleged spouse named in the certificate, and any interested private individuals must be served with summons and published notice. Strict compliance with publication and jurisdictional notice guarantees due process before the trial court orders the entry cancelled.

About these questions and answers
The questions reproduced here are the official texts of the Philippine Bar Examinations, published by the Supreme Court. They are reproduced for study purposes.The suggested answers are the author’s own.

They are not official answers, have no connection with the Supreme Court, the Office of the Bar Confidant, or any bar review institution, and are not endorsed by any of them. Official answer keys, where released, should be preferred over anything here.Nothing on this page is legal advice, and reading it creates no lawyer-client relationship. Do not rely on any suggested answer in an actual legal matter. Consult counsel on your own facts.Suggested answers reflect the law and jurisprudence the author considers applicable as of the date shown.

Where a question comes from an earlier examination, the suggested answer applies the law as it now stands, which may differ from the law in force when the question was given, and may therefore differ from what would have been the correct answer at that time. Where the difference is material, the answer notes it.The practice scoring feature measures wording overlap with the suggested answer. It is not a grade, carries no official weight, and says nothing about whether your reasoning is sound.Errors are possible. If you find one, please tell me and I will correct it.Last reviewed: October 2026