2014 Labor Law, Q6

Lina has been working as a steward with a Miami, U.S.A.-based Loyal Cruise Lines for the past 15 years. She was recruited by a local manning agency, Macapagal Shipping, and was made to sign a 10-month employment contract everytime she left for Miami. Macapagal Shipping paid for Lina’s round-trip travel expenses from Manila to Miami. Because of a food poisoning incident which happened during her last cruise assignment, Lina was not re-hired. Lina claims she has been illegally terminated and seeks separation pay. If you were the Labor Arbiter handlingthe case, how would you decide? (4%)

Quick check

Are seafarers and overseas Filipino workers capable of acquiring regular employment status under the Labor Code through continuous rehiring?

What is the legal effect of the expiration of a seafarer's POEA-approved fixed-term employment contract?

Is a local manning agency legally obligated to re-hire a seafarer upon the expiration of her ten-month employment contract?

Which entity is solidarily liable with a foreign shipowner for contractual money claims of overseas seafarers?

Choices available with full access.

Is a seafarer entitled to separation pay when her employment contract naturally expires without being renewed by the foreign principal?

Choices available with full access.

Unlock the full Labor Law answers

Learn more about these topics

1. Seafarer Employment Status
Under Philippine labor law and established jurisprudence, seafarers and overseas Filipino workers are contractual employees whose employment is fixed-term. They are governed by the standard employment contracts approved by the Philippine Overseas Employment Administration (POEA) or Department of Migrant Workers. Regardless of the length of service or the continuous re-hiring of a seafarer over many years, seafarers do not acquire regular employment status under the Labor Code. Their employment is inherently bound to the specific duration agreed upon in their overseas employment contracts.

2. Contract Expiration Rules
The expiration of a seafarer's fixed-term employment contract automatically terminates the employer-employee relationship by operation of law. Non-renewal or non-rehiring of a seafarer upon contract expiration does not constitute dismissal, whether legal or illegal. Consequently, an overseas employer or local manning agency has no legal obligation to re-hire a seafarer whose contract has expired, as both parties regain their freedom of contract. The employee is likewise not entitled to separation pay upon the natural expiration of their fixed-term contract.

3. Manning Agency Liability
Local manning agencies are jointly and solidarily liable with foreign principal employers for all money claims arising from overseas employment contracts. However, this solidary liability attaches only to obligations that accrue during the effectivity of the contract or unexpired portion thereof in cases of illegal dismissal. Because the non-rehiring of a seafarer after the natural termination of their employment contract is not an actionable injury or illegal termination, no monetary liability or obligation to pay separation pay attaches to either the foreign principal or the local manning agency.

About these questions and answers
The questions reproduced here are the official texts of the Philippine Bar Examinations, published by the Supreme Court. They are reproduced for study purposes.The suggested answers are the author’s own.

They are not official answers, have no connection with the Supreme Court, the Office of the Bar Confidant, or any bar review institution, and are not endorsed by any of them. Official answer keys, where released, should be preferred over anything here.Nothing on this page is legal advice, and reading it creates no lawyer-client relationship. Do not rely on any suggested answer in an actual legal matter. Consult counsel on your own facts.Suggested answers reflect the law and jurisprudence the author considers applicable as of the date shown.

Where a question comes from an earlier examination, the suggested answer applies the law as it now stands, which may differ from the law in force when the question was given, and may therefore differ from what would have been the correct answer at that time. Where the difference is material, the answer notes it.The practice scoring feature measures wording overlap with the suggested answer. It is not a grade, carries no official weight, and says nothing about whether your reasoning is sound.Errors are possible. If you find one, please tell me and I will correct it.Last reviewed: October 2026