2014 Criminal Law, Q20

Which of the following is not a qualifying aggravating circumstance? (1%)
(A) treachery
(B) evident premeditation
(C) dwelling
(D) cruelty

Quick check

Which of the following aggravating circumstances qualifies an unlawful killing to Murder under Article 248 RPC?

What is the legal effect of a generic aggravating circumstance under the Revised Penal Code?

Why is Dwelling classified as a generic aggravating circumstance rather than a qualifying aggravating circumstance?

How do generic aggravating circumstances differ from qualifying aggravating circumstances regarding mitigation?

Choices available with full access.

Which circumstance is an ordinary or generic aggravating circumstance under Article 14 RPC?

Choices available with full access.

Unlock the full Criminal Law answers

Learn more about these topics

1. Qualifying Circumstances
Under Article 248 of the Revised Penal Code, qualifying aggravating circumstances are specific statutory factors that change the legal nature of a crime, such as elevating homicide to murder. Treachery, evident premeditation, and cruelty are explicit qualifying circumstances listed under Article 248. When any of these circumstances is alleged in the information and proven during trial, it alters the felony itself rather than merely increasing the penalty within its statutory period.

2. Generic Circumstances
Under Article 14 of the Revised Penal Code, generic aggravating circumstances are factors that increase the penalty for a felony to its maximum period without changing the nature or definition of the crime. Dwelling, nighttime, and band are examples of generic aggravating circumstances. Unlike qualifying circumstances, generic aggravating circumstances can be offset by generic mitigating circumstances during the judicial computation of penalties under the Revised Penal Code.

3. Dwelling as Aggravating
Under Article 14, paragraph 3 of the Revised Penal Code, dwelling is an ordinary aggravating circumstance arising when a crime is committed in the victim's sanctuary without provocation. Dwelling reflects a greater perversity because the offender violates the sanctity of the victim's home. However, dwelling never acts as a qualifying circumstance under Article 248, meaning it cannot by itself convert homicide into the grave felony of murder.

About these questions and answers
The questions reproduced here are the official texts of the Philippine Bar Examinations, published by the Supreme Court. They are reproduced for study purposes.The suggested answers are the author’s own.

They are not official answers, have no connection with the Supreme Court, the Office of the Bar Confidant, or any bar review institution, and are not endorsed by any of them. Official answer keys, where released, should be preferred over anything here.Nothing on this page is legal advice, and reading it creates no lawyer-client relationship. Do not rely on any suggested answer in an actual legal matter. Consult counsel on your own facts.Suggested answers reflect the law and jurisprudence the author considers applicable as of the date shown.

Where a question comes from an earlier examination, the suggested answer applies the law as it now stands, which may differ from the law in force when the question was given, and may therefore differ from what would have been the correct answer at that time. Where the difference is material, the answer notes it.The practice scoring feature measures wording overlap with the suggested answer. It is not a grade, carries no official weight, and says nothing about whether your reasoning is sound.Errors are possible. If you find one, please tell me and I will correct it.Last reviewed: October 2026