2014 Civil Law, Q22

On March 27, 1980, Cornelio filed an application for land registration involving a parcel of agricultural land that he had bought from Isaac identified as Lot No. 2716 with an area of one (1) hectare. During the trial, Cornelio claimed that he and his predecessors-in-interest had been in open, continuous, uninterrupted, public and adverse possession and occupation of the land for more than thirty (30) years. He likewise introduced in evidence a certification dated February 12, 1981 citing a presidential declaration to the effect that on June 14, 1980, agricultural lands of the public domain, including the subject matter of the application, were declared alienable and disposable agricultural land. (4%)
(A) If you are the judge, will you grant the application for land registration of Cornelio?
(B) Can Cornelio acquire said agricultural land through acquisitive prescription, whether ordinary or extraordinary?

Quick check

Under Section 14(1) of P.D. 1529, when must public land be declared alienable and disposable for registration purposes?

What is required under Article 1113 of the Civil Code to make public land susceptible to acquisitive prescription?

Why is Cornelio's application for land registration under P.D. 1529 legally defective?

Does a presidential declaration classifying public land as alienable and disposable automatically make it patrimonial property?

Choices available with full access.

Can Cornelio acquire the subject agricultural land through acquisitive prescription under Section 14(2) of P.D. 1529?

Choices available with full access.

Unlock the full Civil Law answers

Learn more about these topics

1. Alienable Land Requirement
Under Section 14(1) of Presidential Decree No. 1529, an applicant for land registration must prove that the land applied for has been officially declared alienable and disposable land of the public domain at the time the application is filed. Prior to an express State declaration releasing public land as alienable and disposable, the property remains part of the inalienable public domain under the Regalian doctrine. Consequently, possession of public land prior to its official classification as alienable and disposable cannot be counted toward the required period of open and continuous possession.

2. Patrimonial Land Conversion
Under Section 14(2) of Presidential Decree No. 1529 and Article 1113 of the Civil Code, public land may be acquired through acquisitive prescription only if it has been converted into patrimonial property of the State. An express declaration by the State that the public land is alienable and disposable does not automatically render it patrimonial property. To convert alienable public land into patrimonial property susceptible to prescription, there must be a specific executive or statutory declaration stating that the land is no longer intended for public use, public service, or the development of national wealth.

3. Judicial Confirmation Timing
In judicial confirmation of imperfect title, compliance with statutory requirements is evaluated as of the date of the filing of the application. Subsequent declarations of alienability and disposability issued after the land registration petition has already been filed in court cannot retroactively cure the legal defect of the application. Because the subject land was inalienable at the moment the applicant initiated the land registration proceedings, the court acquires no legal authority to grant judicial confirmation or register title over the property in favor of the applicant.

About these questions and answers
The questions reproduced here are the official texts of the Philippine Bar Examinations, published by the Supreme Court. They are reproduced for study purposes.The suggested answers are the author’s own.

They are not official answers, have no connection with the Supreme Court, the Office of the Bar Confidant, or any bar review institution, and are not endorsed by any of them. Official answer keys, where released, should be preferred over anything here.Nothing on this page is legal advice, and reading it creates no lawyer-client relationship. Do not rely on any suggested answer in an actual legal matter. Consult counsel on your own facts.Suggested answers reflect the law and jurisprudence the author considers applicable as of the date shown.

Where a question comes from an earlier examination, the suggested answer applies the law as it now stands, which may differ from the law in force when the question was given, and may therefore differ from what would have been the correct answer at that time. Where the difference is material, the answer notes it.The practice scoring feature measures wording overlap with the suggested answer. It is not a grade, carries no official weight, and says nothing about whether your reasoning is sound.Errors are possible. If you find one, please tell me and I will correct it.Last reviewed: October 2026