J.C. Construction (J.C.) bought steel bars from Matibay Steel Industries (MSI) which is owned by Buddy Batungbacal. J.C. failed to pay the purchased materials worth P500,000.00 on due date. J.C. persuaded its client Amoroso with whom it had receivables to pay its obligation to MSI. Amoroso agreed and paid MSI the amount of P50,000.00. After two (2) other payments, Amoroso stopped making further payments.
Buddy filed a complaint for collection of the balance of the obligation and damages against J.C. J.C. denied any liability claiming that its obligation was extinguished by reason of novation which took place when MSI accepted partial payments from Amoroso on its behalf.
Was the obligation of J.C. Construction to MSI extinguished by novation? Why? (4%)
Suggested answer only. Not an official answer and not legal advice.
No, the obligation of J.C. Construction to MSI was not extinguished by novation. Under Article 1292 of the Civil Code, novation requires an unequivocal declaration of extinguishment or complete incompatibility between the old
Unlock the full Civil Law answers365 days of full access. GCash, Maya and card accepted.
This is not an official scoring system and carries no weight with the Supreme Court or any bar review provider. It measures how much of the suggested answer's wording your response covers, not whether your reasoning is correct. For practice only.
Quick check
Under Article 1292 of the Civil Code, what is required for an obligation to be extinguished by novation?
Novation requires an unequivocal declaration of extinguishment or total incompatibility between the old and new obligations.
Under Article 1293 of the Civil Code, whose consent is indispensable for a valid novation by substitution of debtors?
Article 1293 explicitly requires the consent of the creditor for any substitution of debtors.
What is the legal effect when a creditor accepts partial payments from a third person on behalf of the original debtor?
Mere acceptance of third-party payments does not release the original debtor without express consent by the creditor.
Why was J.C. Construction's obligation to Matibay Steel Industries NOT extinguished by novation?
Choices available with full access.
What legal relationship is created when a third party pays a debtor's obligation with the creditor's acceptance but without releasing the debtor?
Choices available with full access.
Learn more about these topics
1. Requisites of Novation
Under Article 1292 of the Civil Code, in order that an obligation may be extinguished by another which substitute the same, it is imperative that it be so declared in unequivocal terms, or that the old and the new obligations be on every point incompatible with each other. Novation is never presumed under Philippine civil law. For novation to extinguish an existing obligation, the intent to substitute the old obligation with a new legal relationship must be established by clear and convincing evidence, as animus novandi cannot be inferred from ambiguous acts.
2. Substitution of Debtors
Under Article 1293 of the Civil Code, novation which consists in substituting a new debtor in the place of the original one may be made even without the knowledge or against the will of the latter, but not without the consent of the creditor. Third-party payments or performance of an obligation do not automatically result in delegacion or expromision. For a valid substitution of debtor to release the original obligor from legal responsibility, the creditor must give express and unequivocal consent to release the old debtor from his obligation.
3. Third Party Payments
The mere acceptance by a creditor of partial payments made by a third person on behalf of the original debtor does not constitute a valid novation by substitution of debtors. Under settled jurisprudence, a creditor's acceptance of payments from a third party is regarded as a mere addition of a performance source or secondary obligor, rather than a release of the principal debtor. Without an explicit agreement releasing the original debtor from liability, the principal obligor remains fully liable for the unpaid balance of the debt.