2013 Legal and Judicial Ethics, Q1

Atty. Bravo represents Carlos Negar (an insurance agent for Dormir Insurance Co.) in a suit filed by insurance claimant Andy Limot who also sued Dormir Insurance. The insurance policy requires the insured/claimant to give a written notice to the insurance company or its agent within 60 days from the occurrence of the loss.
Limot testified during the trial that he had mailed the notice of the loss to the insurance agent, but admitted that he lost the registry receipt so that he did not have any documentary evidence of the fact of mailing and of the timeliness of the mailed notice. Dormir Insurance denied liability, contending that timely notice had not been given either to the company or its agent. Atty. Bravo’s client, agent Negar, testified and confirmed that he never received any notice.
A few days after Negar testified, he admitted to Atty. Bravo that he had lied when he denied receipt of Limot’s notice; he did receive the notice by mail but immediately shredded it to defeat Limot’s claim.
If you were Atty. Bravo, what would you do in light of your client’s (Carlos Negar’s) disclosure that he perjured himself when he testified? (8%)

Quick check

What must a lawyer do upon discovering that his client offered false testimony in court under the CPRA?

What is a lawyer's duty if a client refuses to rectify perjured testimony given during trial?

How does the duty of candor to the court interact with client confidentiality regarding active perjury?

Which rule governs an attorney's ethical conduct when a client perpetrates fraud upon the court?

Why is an attorney prohibited from knowingly allowing a client's perjured testimony to stand uncorrected?

Learn more about these topics

1. Rectification of Perjury
Under Canon III of the Code of Professional Responsibility and Accountability (CPRA), when a lawyer discovers that his client has offered false testimony or committed perjury during trial, the lawyer is duty-bound to advise the client to rectify the falsehood. The attorney must explain the serious legal consequences of perjury and urge the client to inform the tribunal voluntarily. This rule ensures that legal representation does not become an instrument for perpetrating fraud or deception upon the court.

2. Candor Over Confidentiality
While an attorney owes a high duty of confidentiality and loyalty to a client, the paramount duty of candor to the court prevails when a client refuses to rectify perjured testimony. If the client refuses to correct the false testimony, counsel must promptly inform the court of the falsity or seek leave to withdraw as counsel. A lawyer is an officer of the court and cannot knowingly allow false evidence to remain part of the judicial record.

3. Withdrawal as Counsel
Under the CPRA, an attorney may withdraw from representing a client if the client insists on pursuing an illegal or unethical course of conduct, such as perpetuating perjury. Withdrawal prevents the attorney from becoming complicit in judicial fraud. By seeking permission from the court to withdraw without disclosing privileged communications beyond what is necessary, the lawyer maintains ethical integrity while upholding the administration of justice.

About these questions and answers
The questions reproduced here are the official texts of the Philippine Bar Examinations, published by the Supreme Court. They are reproduced for study purposes.The suggested answers are the author’s own.

They are not official answers, have no connection with the Supreme Court, the Office of the Bar Confidant, or any bar review institution, and are not endorsed by any of them. Official answer keys, where released, should be preferred over anything here.Nothing on this page is legal advice, and reading it creates no lawyer-client relationship. Do not rely on any suggested answer in an actual legal matter. Consult counsel on your own facts.Suggested answers reflect the law and jurisprudence the author considers applicable as of the date shown.

Where a question comes from an earlier examination, the suggested answer applies the law as it now stands, which may differ from the law in force when the question was given, and may therefore differ from what would have been the correct answer at that time. Where the difference is material, the answer notes it.The practice scoring feature measures wording overlap with the suggested answer. It is not a grade, carries no official weight, and says nothing about whether your reasoning is sound.Errors are possible. If you find one, please tell me and I will correct it.Last reviewed: October 2026