2012 Remedial Law, Q9

X, an undersecretary of DENR, was charged before the Sandiganbayan for malversation of public funds allegedly committed when he was still the Mayor of a town in Rizal. After arraignment, the prosecution moved that X be preventively suspended. X opposed the motion arguing that he was now occupying a position different from that which the Information charged him and therefore, there is no more possibility that he can intimidate witnesses and hamper the prosecution. Decide. Suppose X files a Motion to Quash challenging the validity of the Information and the Sandiganbayan denies the same, will there still be a need to conduct a pre-suspension hearing? Explain. (5%)
Briefly discuss/differentiate the following kinds of Attachment:
preliminary attachment, garnishment, levy on execution, warrant of seizure and warrant of distraint and levy. (5%)

Quick check

Under Section 13 of R.A. 3019, when is preventive suspension mandatory for an incumbent public officer?

Why is a separate pre-suspension hearing unnecessary after the court denies an accused officer's Motion to Quash?

What distinguishes garnishment from an ordinary levy on real property?

What is the specific legal purpose of a warrant of distraint and levy?

Choices available with full access.

Which writ is issued at the commencement of an action to secure a debtor's property for potential judgment satisfaction?

Choices available with full access.

Unlock the full Remedial Law answers

Learn more about these topics

1. Preventive Suspension Rules
Under Section 13 of Republic Act No. 3019, preventive suspension is mandatory for any incumbent public officer facing a valid Information involving fraud, malversation, or corrupt practices. The statutory purpose of preventive suspension is to prevent the officer from hampering prosecution, tampering with evidence, or committing further acts of misconduct. Jurisprudence establishes that preventive suspension applies regardless of whether the accused public officer now holds a different office or position from the one occupied when the alleged offense was committed, provided the officer remains in public service during the pendency of the criminal proceedings.

2. Pre-Suspension Hearing
A pre-suspension hearing is required before issuing a preventive suspension order to afford the accused public officer due process and an opportunity to challenge the validity of the Information. However, where the accused files a Motion to Quash challenging the validity of the Information and the trial court or Sandiganbayan formally hears and denies the motion, the requirement of a pre-suspension hearing is fully satisfied. The judicial determination upholding the Information's validity during the motion to quash proceedings obviates the need for conducting a redundant pre-suspension hearing.

3. Modes of Attachment
Different modes of attachment serve distinct legal procedures. Preliminary attachment is a provisional remedy issued at the inception of litigation to secure potential judgments against a debtor's property. Garnishment is a species of attachment targeting credits, debts, or bank deposits owed by a third party to the defendant. Levy on execution enforces a final and executory judgment by seizing property to satisfy a court award. Warrants of seizure confiscate contraband or instrumentalities of crime in criminal procedure, while warrants of distraint and levy are administrative remedies utilized to collect delinquent taxes.

About these questions and answers
The questions reproduced here are the official texts of the Philippine Bar Examinations, published by the Supreme Court. They are reproduced for study purposes.The suggested answers are the author’s own.

They are not official answers, have no connection with the Supreme Court, the Office of the Bar Confidant, or any bar review institution, and are not endorsed by any of them. Official answer keys, where released, should be preferred over anything here.Nothing on this page is legal advice, and reading it creates no lawyer-client relationship. Do not rely on any suggested answer in an actual legal matter. Consult counsel on your own facts.Suggested answers reflect the law and jurisprudence the author considers applicable as of the date shown.

Where a question comes from an earlier examination, the suggested answer applies the law as it now stands, which may differ from the law in force when the question was given, and may therefore differ from what would have been the correct answer at that time. Where the difference is material, the answer notes it.The practice scoring feature measures wording overlap with the suggested answer. It is not a grade, carries no official weight, and says nothing about whether your reasoning is sound.Errors are possible. If you find one, please tell me and I will correct it.Last reviewed: October 2026