2010 Remedial Law, Q18

While window-shopping at the mall on August 4, 2008, Dante lost his organizer including his credit card and billing statement. Two days later, upon reporting the matter to the credit card company, he learned that a one-way airplane ticket was purchased online using his credit card for a flight to Milan in mid- August 2008. Upon extensive inquiry with the airline company, Dante discovered that the plane ticket was under the name of one Dina Meril. Dante approaches you for legal advice.
a. What is the proper procedure to prevent Dina from leaving the Philippines? (2%)
b. Suppose an Information is filed against Dina on August 12, 2008 and she is immediately arrested. What pieces of electronic evidence will Dante have to secure in order to prove the fraudulent online transaction? (2%)

Quick check

How can the prosecution prevent an accused in a pending criminal case before the RTC from fleeing the Philippines?

Under the Rules on Electronic Evidence, how are electronic data messages authenticated in court?

Which of the following constitutes admissible electronic evidence to prove a fraudulent online purchase?

Which court has the authority to issue a Hold Departure Order in criminal cases under Supreme Court guidelines?

Choices available with full access.

What is the evidentiary weight of an authenticated electronic document under the Rules on Electronic Evidence?

Choices available with full access.

Unlock the full Remedial Law answers

Learn more about these topics

1. Hold Departure Order
Under circulars of the Supreme Court and rules of criminal procedure, a Hold Departure Order (HDO) may be issued by the Regional Trial Court in criminal cases within its jurisdiction. Once an Information is filed in court, the prosecution or private complainant may file an urgent motion for the issuance of an HDO to command the Bureau of Immigration to prevent the accused from departing Philippine territory. An HDO ensures that the accused remains within the court's jurisdiction to face trial and prevents the evasion of criminal liability.

2. Electronic Evidence Rules
Under the Rules on Electronic Evidence (A.M. No. 01-7-01-SC), an electronic document or data message is admissible in evidence if it complies with the rules on admissibility prescribed by the Rules of Court and is authenticated. To prove a fraudulent online transaction, the prosecution must present electronic data messages such as computer printouts of the credit card billing statement, the online ticket booking confirmation, and the electronic purchase receipt. These electronic records serve as the functional equivalent of written documents in establishing credit card fraud.

3. Electronic Document Authentication
Under Rule 5 of the Rules on Electronic Evidence, electronic documents are authenticated by evidence showing that the document had at all times been kept in a reliable manner or by testimony demonstrating the integrity and accuracy of the computer system. In credit card fraud cases, presenting the digital audit trail, system transaction logs from the credit card company, and official booking records from the airline company establishes the authenticity of the fraudulent transaction and links the unauthorized purchase directly to the online user.

About these questions and answers
The questions reproduced here are the official texts of the Philippine Bar Examinations, published by the Supreme Court. They are reproduced for study purposes.The suggested answers are the author’s own.

They are not official answers, have no connection with the Supreme Court, the Office of the Bar Confidant, or any bar review institution, and are not endorsed by any of them. Official answer keys, where released, should be preferred over anything here.Nothing on this page is legal advice, and reading it creates no lawyer-client relationship. Do not rely on any suggested answer in an actual legal matter. Consult counsel on your own facts.Suggested answers reflect the law and jurisprudence the author considers applicable as of the date shown.

Where a question comes from an earlier examination, the suggested answer applies the law as it now stands, which may differ from the law in force when the question was given, and may therefore differ from what would have been the correct answer at that time. Where the difference is material, the answer notes it.The practice scoring feature measures wording overlap with the suggested answer. It is not a grade, carries no official weight, and says nothing about whether your reasoning is sound.Errors are possible. If you find one, please tell me and I will correct it.Last reviewed: October 2026