2010 Remedial Law, Q15

Pedrillo, a Fil-Am permanent resident of Los Angeles, California at the time of his death, bequeathed to Winston a sum of money to purchase an annuity.
Upon Pedrillo’s demise, his will was duly probated in Los Angeles and the specified sum in the will was in fact used to purchase an annuity with XYZ of Hong Kong so that Winston would receive the equivalent of US$1,000 per month for the next 15 years.
Wanting to receive the principal amount of the annuity, Winston files for the probate of Pedrillo’s will in the Makati RTC. As prayed for, the court names Winston as administrator of the estate.
Winston now files in the Makati RTC a motion to compel XYZ to account for all sums in its possession forming part of Pedrillo’s estate. Rule on the motion. (5%)

Quick check

May a Philippine probate court issue an order compelling a foreign corporation located in Hong Kong to account for funds held abroad?

What is a mandatory jurisdictional requirement for a Philippine court to entertain the probate of a non-resident decedent's will?

Where should the estate of a non-resident decedent who left property in the Philippines be settled under Rule 73?

What is the legal effect if a non-resident decedent left no property within the territory of the Philippines at the time of death?

Choices available with full access.

Can a probate court order the turnover of an annuity held by a foreign bank abroad for an estate probated in the Philippines?

Choices available with full access.

Unlock the full Remedial Law answers

Learn more about these topics

1. Probate Territorial Limits
Under Rule 73 of the Rules of Court, the writs, processes, and orders of a Philippine trial court acting as a probate court cannot extend beyond the territorial jurisdiction of the Philippines. A probate court possesses no extraterritorial power to issue compulsory process, injunctions, or accounting orders against a foreign entity residing or incorporated outside Philippine territory. Consequently, a motion seeking to compel a foreign corporation located in another country to account for funds held abroad must be denied for lack of extraterritorial jurisdiction.

2. Non-Resident Estate Jurisdiction
For a non-resident decedent who died outside the Philippines, the primary jurisdictional requisite for initiating probate or administration proceedings in Philippine courts is the existence of real or personal property left by the decedent within the Philippines at the time of death. Where a non-resident testator leaves no estate or assets located within the Philippine territory, Philippine courts acquire no jurisdiction over the subject matter of the estate. In such cases, allowance of the foreign will or administration of the estate cannot be entertained.

3. Extraterritorial Process Limits
Philippine courts cannot enforce in personam jurisdiction or property accountings against foreign entities that have no presence or property in the Philippines. In probate proceedings, court orders compelling an accounting or delivery of estate properties apply only to properties within the custody of the court or persons subject to its process. When the target property consists of an annuity administered by a foreign corporation in a foreign jurisdiction, the local probate court lacks authority to enforce compliance with its orders.

About these questions and answers
The questions reproduced here are the official texts of the Philippine Bar Examinations, published by the Supreme Court. They are reproduced for study purposes.The suggested answers are the author’s own.

They are not official answers, have no connection with the Supreme Court, the Office of the Bar Confidant, or any bar review institution, and are not endorsed by any of them. Official answer keys, where released, should be preferred over anything here.Nothing on this page is legal advice, and reading it creates no lawyer-client relationship. Do not rely on any suggested answer in an actual legal matter. Consult counsel on your own facts.Suggested answers reflect the law and jurisprudence the author considers applicable as of the date shown.

Where a question comes from an earlier examination, the suggested answer applies the law as it now stands, which may differ from the law in force when the question was given, and may therefore differ from what would have been the correct answer at that time. Where the difference is material, the answer notes it.The practice scoring feature measures wording overlap with the suggested answer. It is not a grade, carries no official weight, and says nothing about whether your reasoning is sound.Errors are possible. If you find one, please tell me and I will correct it.Last reviewed: October 2026