Is the defense of Atty. R in a disbarment complaint for immorality filed by his paramour P that P is in pari delicto material or a ground for exoneration? Explain. (3%)
Suggested answer only. Not an official answer and not legal advice.
No, the defense that P is in pari delicto is neither material nor a ground for exoneration. Under settled jurisprudence, the principle of in pari delicto is not applicable to disbarment proceedings against lawyers. Disbarment proceedings are sui generis, conducted
Unlock the full Remedial Law answers365 days of full access. GCash, Maya and card accepted.
This is not an official scoring system and carries no weight with the Supreme Court or any bar review provider. It measures how much of the suggested answer's wording your response covers, not whether your reasoning is correct. For practice only.
Quick check
Is the defense of in pari delicto applicable in disbarment proceedings against a lawyer?
The doctrine of in pari delicto is inapplicable to disbarment proceedings because they are sui generis.
What is the primary legal objective of disbarment proceedings against members of the Bar?
Disbarment proceedings aim to determine the moral fitness of an attorney to remain a member of the Bar.
How does a complainant's personal motive or complicity affect an administrative complaint for immorality against a lawyer?
The complainant's personal motives or complicity do not affect the attorney's administrative liability.
Why is a lawyer's continuation of good moral character required after admission to the Bar?
Choices available with full access.
What is the characterization of disbarment proceedings under Philippine legal procedure?
Choices available with full access.
Learn more about these topics
1. In Pari Delicto
Under Philippine jurisprudence, the equitable doctrine of in pari delicto does not apply to administrative disciplinary proceedings against members of the Bar. In pari delicto applies to civil law disputes between private litigants seeking judicial relief against each other. Because administrative complaints against lawyers are not private actions for damages, a complainant's equal guilt, improper motive, or clean hands status is completely irrelevant. The Supreme Court evaluates the attorney's moral fitness independently of the complainant's character.
2. Sui Generis Nature
Disbarment and disciplinary proceedings against attorneys are sui generis in nature. They are neither civil nor criminal actions, but administrative inquiries conducted by the Supreme Court in the exercise of its inherent authority over the Legal Profession. The primary objective is not to punish the lawyer or compensate the private complainant, but to protect the public, preserve the integrity of the judiciary, and maintain high ethical standards among Bar members.
3. Moral Conduct Obligations
A lawyer is required to maintain good moral character as a continuing condition for membership in the Philippine Bar. Engaging in illicit extramarital relations or immoral conduct violates the lawyer's professional oath and ethical canons. The fact that the paramour voluntarily participated in or initiated the immoral relationship does not condone the attorney's misconduct. A lawyer cannot evade administrative liability by blaming the paramour's willingness or equal fault.