2010 Criminal Law, Q2

a. What is the crime of qualified bribery? (2%)
b. May a judge be charged and prosecuted for such felony? How about a public prosecutor? A police officer? Explain. (5%)

Quick check

What essential element distinguishes qualified bribery under Article 211-A of the RPC from direct bribery under Article 210?

Why is a trial judge EXCLUDED from prosecution for the crime of qualified bribery under Article 211-A?

Which of the following public officers may be held criminally liable for qualified bribery under Article 211-A of the RPC?

What degree of penalty for the underlying crime is required to ground a charge of qualified bribery against a law enforcer?

What offense is committed by a trial judge who accepts a monetary gift to dismiss a pending criminal case?

Learn more about these topics

1. Qualified Bribery Elements
Under Article 211-A of the Revised Penal Code, qualified bribery is committed by any public officer entrusted with law enforcement who refrains from arresting or prosecuting an offender who has committed a crime punishable by reclusion perpetua and/or death, in consideration of any offer, promise, gift, or present. The essential elements require that the offender be a law enforcement officer, that the underlying offense carries a capital penalty or reclusion perpetua, and that the officer refrains from performing official duty in exchange for a bribe.

2. Inapplicability to Judges
Judges cannot be held criminally liable for qualified bribery under Article 211-A of the Revised Penal Code. The statutory definition explicitly restricts the felony to public officers entrusted with law enforcement duties, specifically the arrest or prosecution of offenders. While judges are public officers, their constitutional function is strictly adjudicative rather than executive or prosecutorial. A judge who accepts a bribe to render an unjust judgment or refrain from performing a judicial duty commits direct bribery under Article 210 or indirect bribery under Article 211, rather than qualified bribery.

3. Liability of Enforcers
Public prosecutors and police officers are public officers directly entrusted by law with law enforcement responsibilities, specifically the investigation, arrest, and prosecution of criminal offenders. If a prosecutor or police officer receives a bribe to refrain from arresting or prosecuting a person who committed a crime punishable by reclusion perpetua or death, all elements of qualified bribery concur. Consequently, both public prosecutors and police officers fall squarely within the coverage of Article 211-A and may be prosecuted for qualified bribery.

About these questions and answers
The questions reproduced here are the official texts of the Philippine Bar Examinations, published by the Supreme Court. They are reproduced for study purposes.The suggested answers are the author’s own.

They are not official answers, have no connection with the Supreme Court, the Office of the Bar Confidant, or any bar review institution, and are not endorsed by any of them. Official answer keys, where released, should be preferred over anything here.Nothing on this page is legal advice, and reading it creates no lawyer-client relationship. Do not rely on any suggested answer in an actual legal matter. Consult counsel on your own facts.Suggested answers reflect the law and jurisprudence the author considers applicable as of the date shown.

Where a question comes from an earlier examination, the suggested answer applies the law as it now stands, which may differ from the law in force when the question was given, and may therefore differ from what would have been the correct answer at that time. Where the difference is material, the answer notes it.The practice scoring feature measures wording overlap with the suggested answer. It is not a grade, carries no official weight, and says nothing about whether your reasoning is sound.Errors are possible. If you find one, please tell me and I will correct it.Last reviewed: October 2026