2010 Civil Law, Q5

G filed on July 8, 2000 a petition for declaration of nullity of her marriage to B. During the pendency of the case, the couple entered into a compromise agreement to dissolve their absolute community of property. B ceded his right to their house and lot and all his shares in two business firms to G and their two children, aged 18 and 19.
B also opened a bank account in the amount of P3 million in the name of the two children to answer for their educational expenses until they finish their college degrees.
For her part, G undertook to shoulder the day-to-day living expenses and upkeep of the children. The Court approved the spouses’ agreement on September 8, 2000.
Suppose the business firms suffered reverses, rendering G unable to support herself and the children. Can G still ask for support pendente lite from B? Explain. (3%)
Suppose in late 2004 the two children had squandered the P3 million fund for their education before they could obtain their college degrees, can they ask for more support from B? Explain. (3%)

Quick check

Under Articles 68 and 198 of the Family Code, why is a wife entitled to support pendente lite during a pending petition for nullity of marriage?

Under Article 194 of the Family Code, until when does a parent's obligation to provide educational support to a child extend?

Under Article 2035 of the Civil Code, what is the legal status of a compromise agreement that waives or limits future support?

Why may children who squandered a pre-funded educational bank account still demand further educational support from their father?

Under Article 201 of the Family Code, how is the amount of support determined and adjusted over time?

Learn more about these topics

1. Support Pendente Lite
Under Article 68 and Article 198 of the Family Code, spouses are mutually bound to support each other during the subsistence of the marriage. When a petition for declaration of absolute nullity of marriage is pending, the marriage bond remains legally intact until a final decree of nullity is rendered by the court. Consequently, a spouse rendered unable to support herself due to unforeseen financial reverses retains the statutory right to apply for support pendente lite from the other spouse throughout the duration of the judicial proceedings.

2. Educational Support Extent
Under Article 194 and Article 198 of the Family Code, parental support encompasses everything indispensable for sustenance, dwelling, clothing, medical attendance, and education. Support for schooling or training for some profession, trade, or vocation extends even beyond the age of majority until the child completes or finishes education. Consequently, parents remain under a legal obligation to provide necessary educational support to their children who have reached majority age until they successfully earn their college degrees, provided the need exists.

3. Non-Compromise Future Support
Under Article 2035 of the Civil Code in relation to Article 201 of the Family Code, no compromise or renunciation shall be valid with respect to future support. Furthermore, the amount of support is never final or static, as it is inherently variable and subject to modification whenever the necessity of the recipient increases or the resources of the obligor change. Even if a lump-sum fund established by agreement is squandered, children may still lawfully claim additional support from their parent.

About these questions and answers
The questions reproduced here are the official texts of the Philippine Bar Examinations, published by the Supreme Court. They are reproduced for study purposes.The suggested answers are the author’s own.

They are not official answers, have no connection with the Supreme Court, the Office of the Bar Confidant, or any bar review institution, and are not endorsed by any of them. Official answer keys, where released, should be preferred over anything here.Nothing on this page is legal advice, and reading it creates no lawyer-client relationship. Do not rely on any suggested answer in an actual legal matter. Consult counsel on your own facts.Suggested answers reflect the law and jurisprudence the author considers applicable as of the date shown.

Where a question comes from an earlier examination, the suggested answer applies the law as it now stands, which may differ from the law in force when the question was given, and may therefore differ from what would have been the correct answer at that time. Where the difference is material, the answer notes it.The practice scoring feature measures wording overlap with the suggested answer. It is not a grade, carries no official weight, and says nothing about whether your reasoning is sound.Errors are possible. If you find one, please tell me and I will correct it.Last reviewed: October 2026