2010 Civil Law, Q13

Franz was the owner of Lot E which was surrounded by four (4) lots one of which – Lot C – he also owned. He promised Ava that if she bought Lot E, he would give her a right of way in Lot C.
Convinced, Ava bought Lot E and, as promised, Franz gave her a right of way in Lot C.
Ava cultivated Lot E and used the right of way granted by Franz.
Ava later found gainful employment abroad. On her return after more than 10 years, the right of way was no longer available to her because Franz had in the meantime sold Lot C to Julia who had it fenced.
Does Ava have a right to demand from Julia the activation of her right of way? Explain. (2.5%)
Assuming Ava opts to demand a right of way from any of the owners of Lots A, B, and D, can she do that? Explain. (2.5%)

Quick check

Under Article 617 of the Civil Code, what is the legal nature of an easement relative to the estate to which it belongs?

Under Article 619 of the Civil Code, how is a voluntary easement created?

Under Article 649 of the Civil Code, what is required for an owner of an enclosed landlocked estate to demand a compulsory legal right of way?

What happens to a voluntary right of way granted on a servient lot when the servient lot is sold to a third party who fences it?

Choices available with full access.

Under Article 652 of the Civil Code, what is the obligation of a seller who sells an enclosed lot surrounded by his other properties?

Choices available with full access.

Unlock the full Civil Law answers

Learn more about these topics

1. Inseparability Of Easements
Under Article 617 of the Civil Code, easements are inseparable from the estate to which they actively or passively belong. An easement granted on a servient estate attaches directly to the land itself as a real right rather than a mere personal obligation of the grantor. Consequently, when the servient estate is subsequently sold or transferred to a third person, the easement remains intact and continues to burden the property, binding the new owner regardless of whether the dominant owner temporarily ceased using it.

2. Voluntary Right Way
Under Article 619 and Article 688 of the Civil Code, voluntary easements are established by the will of the owners of the dominant and servient estates. When a property owner voluntarily grants a right of way over his land in favor of another lot to induce its purchase, a valid voluntary easement is created. Once established, the owner of the servient estate cannot unilaterally revoke, obstruct, or fence off the right of way to the prejudice of the dominant estate's owner.

3. Compulsory Legal Easement
Under Article 649 and Article 652 of the Civil Code, an owner of an estate surrounded by other immovables without an adequate outlet to a public highway is entitled to demand a compulsory right of way over neighboring properties. If an isolated estate was acquired through sale or grant, the grantor is obliged to provide a right of way without indemnity. However, the dominant owner may also legally demand an easement from other surrounding owners upon establishing statutory necessity and paying proper indemnity.

About these questions and answers
The questions reproduced here are the official texts of the Philippine Bar Examinations, published by the Supreme Court. They are reproduced for study purposes.The suggested answers are the author’s own.

They are not official answers, have no connection with the Supreme Court, the Office of the Bar Confidant, or any bar review institution, and are not endorsed by any of them. Official answer keys, where released, should be preferred over anything here.Nothing on this page is legal advice, and reading it creates no lawyer-client relationship. Do not rely on any suggested answer in an actual legal matter. Consult counsel on your own facts.Suggested answers reflect the law and jurisprudence the author considers applicable as of the date shown.

Where a question comes from an earlier examination, the suggested answer applies the law as it now stands, which may differ from the law in force when the question was given, and may therefore differ from what would have been the correct answer at that time. Where the difference is material, the answer notes it.The practice scoring feature measures wording overlap with the suggested answer. It is not a grade, carries no official weight, and says nothing about whether your reasoning is sound.Errors are possible. If you find one, please tell me and I will correct it.Last reviewed: October 2026