2010 Legal and Judicial Ethics, Q19

Judges of the first and second level courts are allowed to receive assistance from the local government units where they are stationed. The assistance could be in the form of equipment or allowance.
Justices at the Court of Appeals in the regional stations in the Visayas and Mindanao are not necessarily residents there, hence, they incur additional expenses for their accommodations.
Pass on the propriety of the Justices’ receipt of assistance/allowance from the local governments. (3%)

Quick check

May Justices of the Court of Appeals stationed in regional stations validly receive allowances from local government units?

What primary ethical risk arises when Court of Appeals Justices accept financial assistance from local governments?

Under the Local Government Code, which judicial officers are authorized to receive local government allowances?

Why are local government units considered sensitive donors regarding appellate judicial allowances?

Choices available with full access.

How does the New Code of Judicial Conduct view appellate justices receiving regional housing assistance from LGUs?

Choices available with full access.

Unlock the full Remedial Law answers

Learn more about these topics

1. Local Government Allowances
Under the Local Government Code, local government units are authorized to grant financial assistance, equipment, or allowances exclusively to judges of first and second-level courts stationed within their respective territorial jurisdictions. This statutory authorization is specifically limited to trial court judges who directly serve local communities. Because the law does not extend this privilege to appellate magistrates, local governments lack statutory authority to appropriate public funds or provide housing allowances to Justices of the Court of Appeals stationed in regional stations.

2. Appellate Judicial Independence
Under the New Code of Judicial Conduct, judges and appellate justices must maintain complete independence and preserve public confidence in judicial neutrality. Local government units and their elected officials are frequent litigants in cases brought before the Court of Appeals, such as petitions for certiorari, administrative disputes, and election protests. Accepting financial allowances or accommodation assistance from local governments creates an impermissible appearance of impropriety, financial dependency, or favoritism, thereby directly compromising the institutional independence and impartiality of the appellate bench.

3. Appearance of Impropriety
The principle of judicial propriety requires appellate justices to avoid not only actual conflicts of interest but also the mere appearance of impropriety in all financial dealings. Receiving supplementary allowances or benefits from local government units exposes justices to suspicion of political influence or partiality toward donor local governments. To insulate appellate magistrates from local political pressures and preserve public faith in the administration of justice, the Supreme Court strictly prohibits Court of Appeals Justices from accepting local allowances or housing perks.

About these questions and answers
The questions reproduced here are the official texts of the Philippine Bar Examinations, published by the Supreme Court. They are reproduced for study purposes.The suggested answers are the author’s own.

They are not official answers, have no connection with the Supreme Court, the Office of the Bar Confidant, or any bar review institution, and are not endorsed by any of them. Official answer keys, where released, should be preferred over anything here.Nothing on this page is legal advice, and reading it creates no lawyer-client relationship. Do not rely on any suggested answer in an actual legal matter. Consult counsel on your own facts.Suggested answers reflect the law and jurisprudence the author considers applicable as of the date shown.

Where a question comes from an earlier examination, the suggested answer applies the law as it now stands, which may differ from the law in force when the question was given, and may therefore differ from what would have been the correct answer at that time. Where the difference is material, the answer notes it.The practice scoring feature measures wording overlap with the suggested answer. It is not a grade, carries no official weight, and says nothing about whether your reasoning is sound.Errors are possible. If you find one, please tell me and I will correct it.Last reviewed: October 2026