2014 Labor Law, Q5

Liwayway Glass had 600 rank-and-file employees. Three rival unions – A, B, and C ‒ participated in the certification elections ordered by the Med-Arbiter. 500 employees voted. The unions obtained the following votes: A-200; B-150; C-50; 90 employees voted “no union”; and 10 were segregated votes. Out of the segregated votes, four (4) were cast by probationary employees and six (6) were cast by dismissed employees whose respective cases are still on appeal. (10%)
(A) Should the votes of the probationary and dismissed employees be counted in the total votes cast for the purpose of determining the winning labor union?
(B) Was there a valid election?
(C) Should Union A be declared the winner?
(D) Suppose the election is declared invalid, which of the contending unions should represent the rank-and-file employees?
(E) Suppose that in the election, the unions obtained the following votes: A-250; B-150; C-50; 40 voted “no union”; and 10 were segregated votes. Should Union A be certified as the bargaining representative?

Quick check

Who among the following employees is legally entitled to vote in a certification election?

What voter turnout requirement must be met for a certification election to be declared valid?

How is the winning labor union determined in a valid certification election?

What occurs if a certification election is declared invalid due to lack of majority voter turnout?

If 490 valid votes are cast in a certification election, how many votes must a union obtain to be certified?

Learn more about these topics

1. Voter Eligibility Rules
Under Philippine labor law, all rank-and-file employees within the bargaining unit are eligible to vote in a certification election. Probationary employees who have accrued employee status, as well as workers who have been illegally dismissed but whose cases remain pending on appeal, retain their voter eligibility. Their votes are segregated during balloting and opened only if necessary to affect the final election outcome. Restricting voter eligibility strictly requires statutory disqualification, thereby ensuring that all affected workers participate in choosing their exclusive bargaining representative.

2. Certification Election Validity
For a certification election to be valid, a double majority requirement must be satisfied. First, a majority of all eligible rank-and-file employees in the bargaining unit must cast their votes in the election. Second, to be certified as the exclusive bargaining representative, a contending labor union must receive a majority of the total valid votes cast by the voters. If the required voter participation threshold is met, the election is legally valid, regardless of whether any single contending union obtains a winning majority.

3. Majority Vote Threshold
To determine the winning bargaining agent in a certification election, a contending union must secure fifty percent plus one of all valid votes cast. Segregated votes cast by challenged voters are included in the overall count if they are determined to be valid. If no union receives the required majority vote, a runoff election may be conducted between the top two unions, provided the total votes for all unions equal at least fifty percent of the votes cast. If the election is declared invalid, no union can be certified as the representative.

About these questions and answers
The questions reproduced here are the official texts of the Philippine Bar Examinations, published by the Supreme Court. They are reproduced for study purposes.The suggested answers are the author’s own.

They are not official answers, have no connection with the Supreme Court, the Office of the Bar Confidant, or any bar review institution, and are not endorsed by any of them. Official answer keys, where released, should be preferred over anything here.Nothing on this page is legal advice, and reading it creates no lawyer-client relationship. Do not rely on any suggested answer in an actual legal matter. Consult counsel on your own facts.Suggested answers reflect the law and jurisprudence the author considers applicable as of the date shown.

Where a question comes from an earlier examination, the suggested answer applies the law as it now stands, which may differ from the law in force when the question was given, and may therefore differ from what would have been the correct answer at that time. Where the difference is material, the answer notes it.The practice scoring feature measures wording overlap with the suggested answer. It is not a grade, carries no official weight, and says nothing about whether your reasoning is sound.Errors are possible. If you find one, please tell me and I will correct it.Last reviewed: October 2026