2014 Political Law, Q28

From an existing province, Wideland, Congress created a new province, Hundred Isles, consisting of several islands, with an aggregate area of 500 square kilometres. The law creating Hundred Isles was duly approved in a plebiscite called for that purpose. Juan, a taxpayer and a resident of Wideland, assailed the creation of Hundred Isles claiming that it did not comply with the area requirement as set out in the Local Government Code, i.e., an area of at least 2,000 square kilometres. The proponents justified the creation, however, pointing out that the Rules and Regulations Implementing the Local Government Code states that “the land area requirement shall not apply where the pr oposed province is composed of one (1) or more islands.” Accordingly, since the new province consists of several islands, the area requirement need not be satisfied. How tenable is the position of the proponents? (4%)

Quick check

Under Section 461 of the Local Government Code, what is the general continuous land area requirement for creating a new province?

Under Navarro v. Ermita, how does being an island province affect the statutory land area requirement?

What plebiscite requirement must be met for the valid creation of a new province?

Which legal principle authorizes administrative agencies to issue implementing rules that clarify statutory provisions like LGC exemptions?

Choices available with full access.

Why did the Supreme Court in Navarro v. Ermita declare valid the LGC IRR exemption for island provinces?

Choices available with full access.

Unlock the full Political Law answers

Learn more about these topics

1. Creation of Provinces
Under Section 461 of the Local Government Code (Republic Act No. 7160), a province may be created if it satisfies specific statutory requisites regarding average annual income, land area, and population. These statutory indicators ensure that the newly created local government unit possesses sufficient economic viability and territorial capability to deliver essential public services to its inhabitants. The creation must be enacted through a law passed by Congress and subsequently approved by a majority of votes cast in a plebiscite conducted in the political units directly affected.

2. Island Province Exemption
Under Section 461 of the Local Government Code and its Implementing Rules and Regulations, as affirmed in Navarro v. Ermita, the requirement of a continuous land area of at least 2,000 square kilometers does not apply when the proposed province is composed of one or more islands. The physical geographic reality of island territories makes strict adherence to a continuous 2,000-square-kilometer threshold impracticable. Therefore, an island province like Hundred Isles needs only to satisfy the statutory income requirement to be validly created.

3. Implementing Rules Validity
In Navarro v. Ermita, the Supreme Court upheld the validity of the Implementing Rules and Regulations of the Local Government Code, which explicitly exempted island provinces from the land area requirement. Executive agencies tasked with implementing statutes possess administrative rule-making authority to fill in details consistent with legislative intent. By recognizing the geographic constraints of archipelago territories, the administrative exemption harmonizes statutory objectives with practical governance, ensuring that island communities can attain provincial status to foster local autonomy and economic development.

About these questions and answers
The questions reproduced here are the official texts of the Philippine Bar Examinations, published by the Supreme Court. They are reproduced for study purposes.The suggested answers are the author’s own.

They are not official answers, have no connection with the Supreme Court, the Office of the Bar Confidant, or any bar review institution, and are not endorsed by any of them. Official answer keys, where released, should be preferred over anything here.Nothing on this page is legal advice, and reading it creates no lawyer-client relationship. Do not rely on any suggested answer in an actual legal matter. Consult counsel on your own facts.Suggested answers reflect the law and jurisprudence the author considers applicable as of the date shown.

Where a question comes from an earlier examination, the suggested answer applies the law as it now stands, which may differ from the law in force when the question was given, and may therefore differ from what would have been the correct answer at that time. Where the difference is material, the answer notes it.The practice scoring feature measures wording overlap with the suggested answer. It is not a grade, carries no official weight, and says nothing about whether your reasoning is sound.Errors are possible. If you find one, please tell me and I will correct it.Last reviewed: October 2026