2016 Civil Law, Q14

On February 28, 1998, Arthur filed an application for registration of title of a lot in Temate, Cavite before the Regional Trial Court of Naic, Cavite under Section 48(b) of Commonwealth Act No. 141 (CA 141) for judicial confirmation ofimperfect title. Section 48(b) of CA 141 requires possession counted from June 12, 1945. Arthur presented testimonial and documentary evidence that his possession and that of his predecessors-ininterest started in 1936. The lot was declared alienable and disposable (A and D) in 1993 based on a PENRO certification and a certified true copy of the original classification made by the DENR Secretary. The government opposed the application on the ground that the lot was certified A and D only in 1993 while the application was instituted only in 1998. Arthur’s possession of five (5) years from the date of declaration does not comply with the 30-year period required under CA 141. Should the possession of Arthur be reckoned from the date when the lot was declared A and D or from the date of actual possession of the applicant? Explain. (5%)

Quick check

Under Section 48(b) of CA 141 and Section 14(1) of PD 1529, from what date is the applicant's possession reckoned?

According to Republic v. Naguit, when must the land be declared alienable and disposable for registration under Section 14(1) of PD 1529?

What is the effect of possessing land prior to its official declaration as alienable and disposable under the Naguit doctrine?

What documentary evidence is required to prove that land is alienable and disposable public land?

Choices available with full access.

Why did Arthur's land registration application prosper despite the land being declared alienable only in 1993?

Choices available with full access.

Unlock the full Civil Law answers

Learn more about these topics

1. Actual Possession Reckoning
Under Section 48(b) of Commonwealth Act No. 141, as amended, in relation to Section 14(1) of Presidential Decree No. 1529, the requisite period of open, continuous, exclusive, and notorious possession is reckoned from the date of actual possession starting June 12, 1945 or earlier, rather than from the date when the public land was officially classified as alienable and disposable. The statutory requirement dictates that the applicant and his predecessors-in-interest must have possessed the property since the specified cutoff date, regardless of when the administrative classification converting the property into alienable land occurred.

2. Naguit Malabanan Doctrine
Under the doctrine established in Republic v. Naguit and affirmed in Heirs of Malabanan v. Republic, for land registration under Section 14(1) of PD 1529 or Section 48(b) of CA 141, the land need only be declared alienable and disposable at the time the application for registration is filed. Possession prior to the formal declaration of alienability is credited in favor of the applicant, provided the land has been declared alienable and disposable when judicial proceedings commence. The law does not require that the land be alienable during the entire period of possession.

3. Proof Land Classification
To successfully apply for judicial confirmation of imperfect title, the applicant must establish by positive government evidence that the land is alienable and disposable public land. Proof of alienability requires a certified true copy of the original classification approved by the DENR Secretary and an official certification issued by the proper environment officer, such as a PENRO or CENRO. Once alienability is duly proven prior to or at the time of application, actual possession dating back to June 12, 1945 or earlier satisfies the statutory period for registration.

About these questions and answers
The questions reproduced here are the official texts of the Philippine Bar Examinations, published by the Supreme Court. They are reproduced for study purposes.The suggested answers are the author’s own.

They are not official answers, have no connection with the Supreme Court, the Office of the Bar Confidant, or any bar review institution, and are not endorsed by any of them. Official answer keys, where released, should be preferred over anything here.Nothing on this page is legal advice, and reading it creates no lawyer-client relationship. Do not rely on any suggested answer in an actual legal matter. Consult counsel on your own facts.Suggested answers reflect the law and jurisprudence the author considers applicable as of the date shown.

Where a question comes from an earlier examination, the suggested answer applies the law as it now stands, which may differ from the law in force when the question was given, and may therefore differ from what would have been the correct answer at that time. Where the difference is material, the answer notes it.The practice scoring feature measures wording overlap with the suggested answer. It is not a grade, carries no official weight, and says nothing about whether your reasoning is sound.Errors are possible. If you find one, please tell me and I will correct it.Last reviewed: October 2026