Under Sec. 5, Article VIII of the Constitution, the Supreme Court shall have the power to “promulgate rules concerning the protection and enforcement of constitutional rights, pleading, practice and procedure in all courts xxx.” Section 23 of R.A. No. 9165 or the Comprehensive Dangerous Drugs Act of 2002 provides that “any person charged under any provision of this Act regardless of the imposable penalty shall not be allowed to avail of the provision on plea-bargaining.” Patricio, a user who was charged with alleged sale of shabu but who wants to enter a plea of guilt to a charge of possession, questions the constitutionality of Sec. 23 on the ground that Congress encroached on the rule-making power of the Supreme Court under Sec. 5, Article VIII. He argues that plea-bargaining is procedural in nature and is within the exclusive constitutional power of the Court. Is Patricio correct? Explain your answer. (5%)
Suggested answer only. Not an official answer and not legal advice.
Yes, Patricio is correct. Under Section 5(5), Article VIII of the Constitution, the Supreme Court has the exclusive power to promulgate rules concerning pleading, practice, and procedure. In Estipona v.
Unlock the full Political Law answers365 days of full access. GCash, Maya and card accepted.
This is not an official scoring system and carries no weight with the Supreme Court or any bar review provider. It measures how much of the suggested answer's wording your response covers, not whether your reasoning is correct. For practice only.
Quick check
Which constitutional provision vests the Supreme Court with the exclusive power to promulgate rules concerning pleading, practice, and procedure in all courts?
Section 5(5), Article VIII of the 1987 Constitution explicitly grants the Supreme Court the exclusive authority to promulgate rules concerning protection and enforcement of constitutional rights, pleading, practice, and procedure.
In Estipona v. Lobrigo, how did the Supreme Court classify plea bargaining?
The Supreme Court held in Estipona v. Lobrigo that plea bargaining is a rule of procedure falling exclusively within the rule-making authority of the Judiciary.
Why was Section 23 of Republic Act No. 9165 declared unconstitutional in relation to plea bargaining?
Section 23 of Republic Act No. 9165 was declared unconstitutional because Congress encroached upon the Supreme Court's exclusive rule-making power under Section 5(5), Article VIII of the Constitution.
Under the 1987 Constitution, what is a key limitation on the Supreme Court's procedural rule-making power?
Choices available with full access.
Which constitutional principle is violated when Congress enacts a statute that effectively repeals or modifies a rule of procedure promulgated by the Supreme Court?
Choices available with full access.
Learn more about these topics
1. Rule-Making Power
Under Section 5(5), Article VIII of the 1987 Philippine Constitution, the Supreme Court possesses the exclusive power to promulgate rules concerning the protection and enforcement of constitutional rights, pleading, practice, and procedure in all courts. This constitutional authority is part of the safeguards of judicial independence and is no longer shared with the Executive or Legislative departments. Consequently, Congress cannot enact laws that repeal, alter, or modify procedural rules promulgated by the Supreme Court. Any statute that encroaches upon this exclusive rule-making jurisdiction violates the fundamental principle of separation of powers.
2. Plea Bargaining
Plea bargaining is defined as a rule of procedure that allows an accused and the prosecution to reach a mutually satisfactory disposition of a criminal case subject to court approval. It creates no substantive right nor takes away a vested right, but operates as a procedural mechanism to enforce existing rights and administer legal remedies efficiently. In Estipona v. Lobrigo, the Supreme Court held that plea bargaining falls within the exclusive rule-making domain of the Judiciary. Thus, statutory provisions prohibiting plea bargaining in specific offenses unlawfully invade the procedural authority of the Court.
3. Separation of Powers
The doctrine of separation of powers allocates distinct constitutional functions to the executive, legislative, and judicial branches to prevent undue concentration of authority. Under this framework, the legislature is tasked with enacting laws, while the judiciary is vested with the power to interpret laws and promulgate rules of procedure. When Congress enacts a statutory provision that attempts to prohibit or restrict procedural mechanisms like plea bargaining, it oversteps its legislative competence and invades the exclusive domain of the Supreme Court. Such statutory encroachment violates the constitutional boundary between coordinate branches of government.