2016 Political Law, Q14

Onofre, a natural born Filipino citizen, arrived in the United States in 1985. In 1990, he married Salvacion, a Mexican, and together they applied for and obtained American citizenship in 2001. In 2015, the couple and their children –Alfred, 21 years of age, Robert, 16, and Marie, 14, who were all born in the U.S. — returned to the Philippines on June 1, 2015. On June 15, 2015, informed that he could reacquire Philippine citizenship without losing his American citizenship, Onofre went home to the Philippines and took the oath of allegiance prescribed under R.A. No. 9225. On October 28, 2015, he filed a Certificate of Candidacy to run in the May 9, 2016 elections for the position of Congressman in his home province of Pala wan, running against re-electionist Congressman Profundo.
[a] Did Onofre’s reacquisition of Philippine citizenship benefit his wife, Salvacion, and their minor children and confer upon them Filipino citizenship? Explain your answer. (2.5%)
[b] Before the May 9, 2016 elections, Profundo’s lawyer filed a Petition to Deny Due Course or to Cancel the Certificate of Candidacy against Onofre. What grounds can he raise in his Petition to support it? Explain your answer. (2.5%)

Quick check

Under Republic Act No. 9225, who among the following qualifies for derivative Philippine citizenship upon a parent's reacquisition of citizenship?

What requirement must a dual citizen under Republic Act No. 9225 fulfill at or prior to filing a Certificate of Candidacy for elective public office?

Under Article VI, Section 6 of the 1987 Philippine Constitution, what is the residency requirement for a candidate for Member of the House of Representatives?

Why did Onofre's reacquisition of Philippine citizenship under Republic Act No. 9225 fail to confer citizenship upon his wife Salvacion?

Choices available with full access.

Under Section 78 of the Omnibus Election Code, what is the proper ground for a petition to cancel a Certificate of Candidacy?

Choices available with full access.

Unlock the full Political Law answers

Learn more about these topics

1. Derivative Citizenship
Under Section 4 of Republic Act No. 9225, derivative Philippine citizenship is extended only to unmarried children below eighteen years of age of former natural-born Filipinos who reacquire or retain their Philippine citizenship. The benefit does not extend automatically to foreign spouses or adult children. Consequently, minor children reacquire citizenship by operation of law upon the parent's compliance with the oath requirement, while alien spouses must undergo separate naturalization or registration proceedings, and adult children must independently acquire citizenship through applicable statutory modes.

2. Renunciation Requirement
Under Section 5(2) of Republic Act No. 9225, former natural-born Filipino citizens who reacquire Philippine citizenship and seek elective public office must execute a personal and sworn renunciation of any and all foreign citizenships before an authorized public officer at or prior to filing the certificate of candidacy. The mere taking of the oath of allegiance under Section 3 or the act of filing a certificate of candidacy does not substitute for this mandatory sworn statement of renunciation. Failure to execute a proper renunciation renders the candidate ineligible to hold elective public office.

3. Constitutional Residency
Article VI, Section 6 of the 1987 Philippine Constitution requires candidates for the House of Representatives to be registered voters in the district in which they shall be elected and residents thereof for a period of not less than one year immediately preceding the day of the election. For election law purposes, residence is synonymous with legal residence or domicile, which requires bodily presence coupled with an intention to remain and abandon the prior foreign domicile. Returning to the country less than one year before election day fails to satisfy this residency qualification.

About these questions and answers
The questions reproduced here are the official texts of the Philippine Bar Examinations, published by the Supreme Court. They are reproduced for study purposes.The suggested answers are the author’s own.

They are not official answers, have no connection with the Supreme Court, the Office of the Bar Confidant, or any bar review institution, and are not endorsed by any of them. Official answer keys, where released, should be preferred over anything here.Nothing on this page is legal advice, and reading it creates no lawyer-client relationship. Do not rely on any suggested answer in an actual legal matter. Consult counsel on your own facts.Suggested answers reflect the law and jurisprudence the author considers applicable as of the date shown.

Where a question comes from an earlier examination, the suggested answer applies the law as it now stands, which may differ from the law in force when the question was given, and may therefore differ from what would have been the correct answer at that time. Where the difference is material, the answer notes it.The practice scoring feature measures wording overlap with the suggested answer. It is not a grade, carries no official weight, and says nothing about whether your reasoning is sound.Errors are possible. If you find one, please tell me and I will correct it.Last reviewed: October 2026