The unabated rise of criminality and the reported identification of delinquent children loitering in the wee hours of the night prompted City Z to implement a curfew ordinance. Minors unaccompanied or unsupervised on the streets by their parents or guardians between 10:00 P.M. to 5:00 A.M. may be apprehended by law enforcers subject to certain exclusive exceptions. These exceptions are: 1. minors running lawful errands, such as buying of medicines, using of telecommunications facilities for emergency purposes and the like; 2. night school students; and 3. Minors working at night.
Minors apprehended for violation of the curfew ordinance shall be required to undergo counseling, accompanied by their parents/guardians.
(a) Does the curfew ordinance violative the primary right and duty of parents to rear their children? Explain. (2.5%)
(b) Does the curfew ordinance infringe any of the minors’ fundamental rights? Explain. (2.5%)
Suggested answer only. Not an official answer and not legal advice.
(a) No, the curfew ordinance does not violate parents' primary right to rear their children. (b) Yes, it infringes on minors' fundamental rights. Under Section 12, Article II of the Constitution, the State as parens
Unlock the full Political Law answers365 days of full access. GCash, Maya and card accepted.
This is not an official scoring system and carries no weight with the Supreme Court or any bar review provider. It measures how much of the suggested answer's wording your response covers, not whether your reasoning is correct. For practice only.
Quick check
Does a municipal curfew ordinance assisting parents in protecting children violate the primary right of parents to rear their youth?
Under Section 12, Article II of the Constitution, the State as parens patriae complements and supports parental authority in child-rearing.
What judicial test applies when evaluating municipal curfew ordinances that restrict fundamental rights of minors like the right to travel?
Restrictions on fundamental constitutional rights like the right to travel are evaluated using the strict scrutiny test.
Why did the curfew ordinance listing only three exclusive exceptions unconstitutionally infringe upon the fundamental rights of minors?
An ordinance with overly narrow exclusive exceptions fails strict scrutiny by unduly restricting fundamental rights of minors.
Under Section 12, Article II of the 1987 Constitution, what is the role of the Government regarding parental authority?
Choices available with full access.
What two conditions must be satisfied for a law to pass the strict scrutiny test in constitutional adjudication?
Choices available with full access.
Learn more about these topics
1. Parens Patriae Doctrine
Under Section 12, Article II of the 1987 Constitution, the natural and primary right and duty of parents in rearing the youth for civic efficiency and development of moral character shall receive the support of the Government. Under the parens patriae doctrine, the State possesses inherent authority to enact measures that complement and support parental authority in protecting minors from harm and crime. A municipal curfew ordinance that encourages parental responsibility and assists guardians in supervising children during late night hours does not unconstitutionally impair or usurp the primary right and duty of parents to rear their children.
2. Strict Scrutiny Test
Curfew ordinances that restrict fundamental rights such as the right to travel, liberty, free exercise of religion, and peaceable assembly must satisfy the strict scrutiny test. Under strict scrutiny, the law must serve a compelling state interest and be narrowly tailored using the least restrictive means to achieve that objective. While crime prevention and juvenile safety constitute compelling state interests, a curfew ordinance containing overly restrictive or exclusive exceptions fails strict scrutiny. Overly narrow exceptions unnecessarily curtail fundamental constitutional rights and liberties of minors without providing sufficient scope for legitimate night activities.
3. Fundamental Rights Limitations
While the State may regulate juvenile conduct during late night hours, restrictions on fundamental rights must remain narrowly drawn to avoid overbreadth. An ordinance imposing a blanket nighttime curfew that lists only three exclusive exceptions unduly restricts minors' fundamental rights to travel, associate, worship, and express themselves. Because legitimate activities like attending religious gatherings, political meetings, or family emergency travel are excluded, such an ordinance sweeps too broadly into protected constitutional freedoms. Consequently, a curfew ordinance lacking adequate exceptions constitutes an unconstitutional infringement upon the fundamental constitutional rights of minors.