2022 Civil Law, Q5

In 2014, a wealthy young couple, the spouses Tan, moved by the spirit of generosity and love for their hometown in Siquijor, decided to donate a one-hectare lot in favor of the province of Siquijor. The Deed of Donation pertinently provides: “The herein DONORS hereby voluntarily and freely give, transfer and convey, by way of unconditional donation, unto said DONEE, all of the rights, title and interest which the aforesaid DONORS have or which pertain to them and which they owned exclusively in the above-described real property over a one hectare portion of the same, solely for hospital site only and for no other purpose, where a provincial government hospital shall be constructed.” The donation was recorded in the Registry of Deeds, and a certificate of title to the property was transferred to the province of Siquijor. In accordance with the Deed of Donation, the construction of a hospital building was started in the following year. However, for reasons unknown, only the foundation of the hospital building has, to this day, been completed. Do the spouses Tan have valid grounds to revoke the donation? Explain briefly. (5 points)

Quick check

Under Article 764 of the Civil Code, when may a donor revoke a donation?

What is the legal classification of a donation that requires the donee to construct a hospital on the donated land?

Under Philippine civil law, what is the legal effect of non-fulfillment of a condition in a modal donation?

Does building merely the foundation of a required hospital building constitute substantial compliance with a modal donation?

Why do the spouses Tan have valid legal grounds to revoke their donation to the province of Siquijor?

Learn more about these topics

1. Modal Donation Nature
Under Article 764 of the Civil Code, a donation that imposes a specific burden, charge, or future obligation upon the donee is classified as a modal or onerous donation. Although designated as an unconditional conveyance in the deed, the express requirement to use the land solely for constructing a provincial government hospital constitutes a resolutory condition or charge. The donee's acceptance creates an enforceable legal obligation to fulfill the imposed burden within a reasonable timeframe.

2. Non-Fulfillment Revocation
Under Article 764 of the Civil Code, a donation may be revoked at the instance of the donor when the donee fails to comply with any of the conditions imposed in the deed of donation. Non-fulfillment of a resolutory charge operates to extinguish the donee's rights over the donated property. The donor is legally entitled to file an action for judicial revocation to recover ownership and title to the property upon breach of the condition.

3. Substantial Compliance Standard
In modal donations, partial or incomplete performance does not equate to substantial compliance if the core purpose of the donation remains unfulfilled. Constructing merely the foundation of a provincial hospital building over several years falls far short of completing a functional government hospital. Where the donee fails to complete the required facility within a reasonable period, the donor possesses valid legal cause for judicial revocation under Article 764.

About these questions and answers
The questions reproduced here are the official texts of the Philippine Bar Examinations, published by the Supreme Court. They are reproduced for study purposes.The suggested answers are the author’s own.

They are not official answers, have no connection with the Supreme Court, the Office of the Bar Confidant, or any bar review institution, and are not endorsed by any of them. Official answer keys, where released, should be preferred over anything here.Nothing on this page is legal advice, and reading it creates no lawyer-client relationship. Do not rely on any suggested answer in an actual legal matter. Consult counsel on your own facts.Suggested answers reflect the law and jurisprudence the author considers applicable as of the date shown.

Where a question comes from an earlier examination, the suggested answer applies the law as it now stands, which may differ from the law in force when the question was given, and may therefore differ from what would have been the correct answer at that time. Where the difference is material, the answer notes it.The practice scoring feature measures wording overlap with the suggested answer. It is not a grade, carries no official weight, and says nothing about whether your reasoning is sound.Errors are possible. If you find one, please tell me and I will correct it.Last reviewed: October 2026