2023 Political Law, Q16

Bea filed a civil case for collection of a sum of money for non-payment by the province of Cagayan of various hospital supplies it purchased from her, as evidenced by invoices duly received and signed by its authorized representatives. After Bea completed the presentation of her evidence, the province moved to dismiss the case on the ground that the primary jurisdiction over her money claim belongs to the Commission on Audit (COA), as it arose from a series of procurement transactions with the province. The trial court dismissed the case on the ground that jurisdiction over the case lies with the COA. Bea argued that the trial court erred since a collection suit is within the jurisdiction of the courts and the province belatedly invoked the doctrine. Is Bea correct? Explain.

Quick check

Is Bea correct in arguing that the trial court erred in dismissing her money claim against the province?

Under Article IX-D of the 1987 Constitution, which administrative body has primary jurisdiction over money claims against the government?

Can the defense of primary administrative jurisdiction be waived by a government entity's delay in invoking it?

What is the proper legal course for a trial court when a money claim against a municipality is filed directly before it?

Choices available with full access.

What is the proper judicial remedy of a contractor if the Commission on Audit denies its money claim against a province?

Choices available with full access.

Unlock the full Political Law answers

Learn more about these topics

1. COA Primary Jurisdiction
Under Article IX-D, Section 2(1) of the 1987 Constitution, the Commission on Audit holds primary jurisdiction and constitutional power to examine, audit, and settle all accounts pertaining to revenue and receipts of, and expenditures or uses of funds and property owned by the government or any of its subdivisions. Money claims arising from government procurement transactions fall within COA's primary competence. The doctrine of primary jurisdiction prevents trial courts from determining matters requiring administrative expertise and specialized statutory auditing procedures, ensuring that government liability claims undergo thorough state financial regulation prior to judicial intervention.

2. Non-Waiver Of Jurisdiction
The doctrine of primary jurisdiction operates to maintain proper constitutional distribution of powers between trial courts and specialized administrative agencies. Consequently, primary jurisdiction cannot be waived by a party's failure to raise it in a timely motion to dismiss or during early trial proceedings. Even if a local government unit raises primary administrative jurisdiction only after the plaintiff completes presenting evidence, the trial court remains legally obligated to dismiss the civil case. Jurisdiction over money claims against state entities is determined by law and public policy, which cannot be conferred by estoppel.

3. Money Claims Procedure
Government procurement contracts for supplies and services are governed by strict auditing laws and public accounting rules. When a contractor seeks enforcement of an unpaid money claim against a province or municipality, the claim must be filed directly before the Commission on Audit rather than initiating an ordinary collection suit in a Regional Trial Court. The COA possesses specialized jurisdiction to evaluate purchase invoices, delivery receipts, and compliance with statutory procurement requisites. If COA denies the money claim, the claimant's proper legal remedy is to petition the Supreme Court via certiorari.

About these questions and answers
The questions reproduced here are the official texts of the Philippine Bar Examinations, published by the Supreme Court. They are reproduced for study purposes.The suggested answers are the author’s own.

They are not official answers, have no connection with the Supreme Court, the Office of the Bar Confidant, or any bar review institution, and are not endorsed by any of them. Official answer keys, where released, should be preferred over anything here.Nothing on this page is legal advice, and reading it creates no lawyer-client relationship. Do not rely on any suggested answer in an actual legal matter. Consult counsel on your own facts.Suggested answers reflect the law and jurisprudence the author considers applicable as of the date shown.

Where a question comes from an earlier examination, the suggested answer applies the law as it now stands, which may differ from the law in force when the question was given, and may therefore differ from what would have been the correct answer at that time. Where the difference is material, the answer notes it.The practice scoring feature measures wording overlap with the suggested answer. It is not a grade, carries no official weight, and says nothing about whether your reasoning is sound.Errors are possible. If you find one, please tell me and I will correct it.Last reviewed: October 2026