2023 Political Law, Q7

Professor Chiara, a natural-born Filipino citizen, is a resident expert on global military affairs at the National Defense College where she taught for 12 years. In 2017, she was tenured as a faculty member at the leading military academy in the United Kingdom (UK). In April 2022, she was granted British citizenship. Having learned of the renowned expertise of Professor Chiara, the President invited her to return to the Philippines to be appointed as National Security Adviser. Upon her appointment, Professor Chiara took her oath of allegiance to the Philippines and renounced her allegiance to the UK. Not satisfied with these actions, Ramon, the spokesperson of a non-government organization monitoring national security affairs, demanded that Professor Chiara renounce her British citizenship. Is Ramon correct? Explain.

Quick check

Is Ramon correct in demanding that Professor Chiara execute a separate renunciation of British citizenship?

Under Section 5(3) of Republic Act 9225, what are the legal requirements for a dual citizen appointed to public office?

How does Republic Act 9225 distinguish between elective and appointive public officials regarding foreign citizenship?

When must a candidate seeking elective public office execute a personal and sworn renunciation of foreign citizenship under Republic Act 9225?

Choices available with full access.

What is the legal effect of taking an oath of allegiance to the Philippines under Republic Act 9225?

Choices available with full access.

Unlock the full Political Law answers

Learn more about these topics

1. Dual Citizenship Act
Under Republic Act No. 9225, natural-born citizens of the Philippines who become citizens of a foreign country retain or reacquire their Philippine citizenship upon taking an oath of allegiance to the Republic. The law recognizes dual allegiance and establishes distinct legal procedures for dual citizens seeking public office. While natural-born citizenship is retained or reacquired, the statute mandates specific affirmative acts—such as taking a sworn oath of allegiance and renouncing foreign allegiance—to ensure undivided loyalty to the Republic of the Philippines before assuming any public position.

2. Appointive Office Requirements
Section 5(3) of Republic Act No. 9225 governs dual citizens who are appointed to public office in the Philippines. Prior to assumption of office, an appointive official is required to take an oath of allegiance to the Republic of the Philippines and execute a sworn renunciation of foreign allegiance before an authorized officer. Unlike candidates seeking elective office, appointive public officials are not required by law to execute a separate, personal, and sworn renunciation of foreign citizenship itself. The statutory mandate for appointive positions is fully satisfied by renouncing foreign allegiance.

3. Elective Versus Appointive
Republic Act No. 9225 establishes a clear statutory distinction between qualifications for elective and appointive public positions. Under Section 5(2), candidates seeking elective public office must execute a personal and sworn renunciation of any and all foreign citizenship at the time of filing their certificate of candidacy. Conversely, under Section 5(3), appointive officials need only take an oath of allegiance and renounce foreign allegiance. Imposing the extra requirement of executing a formal renunciation of foreign citizenship upon appointive officials creates an unauthorized legal burden not contemplated by statute.

About these questions and answers
The questions reproduced here are the official texts of the Philippine Bar Examinations, published by the Supreme Court. They are reproduced for study purposes.The suggested answers are the author’s own.

They are not official answers, have no connection with the Supreme Court, the Office of the Bar Confidant, or any bar review institution, and are not endorsed by any of them. Official answer keys, where released, should be preferred over anything here.Nothing on this page is legal advice, and reading it creates no lawyer-client relationship. Do not rely on any suggested answer in an actual legal matter. Consult counsel on your own facts.Suggested answers reflect the law and jurisprudence the author considers applicable as of the date shown.

Where a question comes from an earlier examination, the suggested answer applies the law as it now stands, which may differ from the law in force when the question was given, and may therefore differ from what would have been the correct answer at that time. Where the difference is material, the answer notes it.The practice scoring feature measures wording overlap with the suggested answer. It is not a grade, carries no official weight, and says nothing about whether your reasoning is sound.Errors are possible. If you find one, please tell me and I will correct it.Last reviewed: October 2026