Marinella is a junior officer of the Armed Forces of the Philippines who claims to have personally witnessed the malversation of funds given by US authorities in connection with the Balikatan exercises.
Marinella alleges that as a result of her exposé, there are operatives within the military who are out to kill her. She files a petition for the issuance of a writ of amparo against, among others, the Chief of Staff but without alleging that the latter ordered that she be killed.
Atty. Daro, counsel for the Chief of Staff, moves for the dismissal of the Petition for failure to allege that his client issued any order to kill or harm Marinella. Rule on Atty. Daro’s motion. Explain. (3%)
Suggested answer only. Not an official answer and not legal advice.
Atty. Daro's motion to dismiss must be denied. Under Section 11(a) of the Rule on the Writ of Amparo (A.M. No. 07-9-12-SC), a motion to dismiss is a prohibited pleading. Furthermore, under the Amparo rule, responsibility extends to official
Unlock the full Remedial Law answers365 days of full access. GCash, Maya and card accepted.
This is not an official scoring system and carries no weight with the Supreme Court or any bar review provider. It measures how much of the suggested answer's wording your response covers, not whether your reasoning is correct. For practice only.
Quick check
Is a motion to dismiss permissible in a petition for the issuance of a Writ of Amparo?
Under Section 11(a) of the Rule on the Writ of Amparo, a motion to dismiss is a prohibited pleading.
Under the Rule on the Writ of Amparo, must a petition allege that a military superior directly ordered the threat to life?
Accountability under the Writ of Amparo extends to superiors for failure to prevent or investigate threats by subordinates.
What constitutional rights are primarily protected by the issuance of a Writ of Amparo?
The Writ of Amparo protects the constitutional rights to life, liberty, and security.
What is the primary procedural objective of prohibiting motions to dismiss in Amparo proceedings?
Choices available with full access.
How should a trial court rule on a motion to dismiss filed by the respondent in a Writ of Amparo case?
Choices available with full access.
Learn more about these topics
1. Prohibited Pleadings Rule
Under Section 11(a) of the Rule on the Writ of Amparo (A.M. No. 07-9-12-SC), a motion to dismiss is explicitly classified as a prohibited pleading. The court cannot entertain or rule on the merits of a motion to dismiss filed in an Amparo proceeding. The procedural intent of this rule is to prevent procedural delays and ensure the summary nature of Amparo proceedings aimed at protecting constitutional rights to life, liberty, and security.
2. Amparo Command Responsibility
Under the Rule on the Writ of Amparo, responsibility and accountability extend beyond direct orders to commit unlawful acts. Superiors in government agencies or military organizations may be held accountable for threats or violations committed by subordinates if they failed to exercise due diligence to prevent or investigate such acts. Consequently, the absence of a direct order to kill or harm from a high-ranking officer does not justify excluding that officer from an Amparo petition.
3. Scope of Amparo
The Writ of Amparo is a protective remedy available to any person whose right to life, liberty, and security is violated or threatened with violation by an unlawful act or omission of a public official, employee, or private individual. The petition covers extrajudicial killings, enforced disappearances, and threats thereof. Because the remedy seeks preventive and curative relief rather than criminal or civil liability, technical pleading requirements are relaxed in favor of summary protection.