a) Siga-an granted a loan to Villanueva in the amount of P 540, 000.00. Such agreement was not reduced to writing. Siga-an demanded interest which was paid by Villanueva in cash and checks. The total amount Villanueva paid accumulated to P 1, 200, 000.00. Upon advice of her lawyer, Villanueva demanded for the return of the excess amount of P 660, 000.00 which was ignored by Siga-an.
1) Is the payment of interest valid? Explain. (3%)
2) Is solution indebiti applicable? Explain. (2%)
b) Eulalia was engaged in the business of buying and selling large cattle. In order to secure the financial capital, she advanced for her employees (biyaheros). She required them to surrender TCT of their properties and to execute the corresponding Deeds of Sale in her favor. Domeng Bandong was not required to post any security but when Eulalia discovered that he incurred shortage in cattle procurement operation, he was required to execute a Deed of Sale over a parcel of land in favor of Eulalia. She sold the property to her grandneice Jocelyn who thereafter instituted an action for ejectment against the Spouses Bandong.
To assert their right, Spouses Bandong filed an action for annulment of sale against Eulalia and Jocelyn alleging that there was no sale intended but only equitable mortgage for the purpose of securing the shortage incurred by Domeng in the amount of P 70, 000.00 while employed as “biyahero” by Eulalia. Was the Deed of Sale between Domeng and Eulalia a contract of sale or an equitable mortgage? Explain. (5%)
Suggested answer only. Not an official answer and not legal advice.
(a1) No, the payment of interest is not valid. (a2) Yes, solutio indebiti is applicable. (b) The Deed of Sale is an equitable mortgage. Under Article 1956 of the Civil Code, interest is not due unless
Unlock the full Civil Law answers365 days of full access. GCash, Maya and card accepted.
This is not an official scoring system and carries no weight with the Supreme Court or any bar review provider. It measures how much of the suggested answer's wording your response covers, not whether your reasoning is correct. For practice only.
Quick check
Under Article 1956 of the Civil Code, what is required for interest on a loan to be legally demandable?
Article 1956 explicitly requires an express stipulation in writing for interest to be due.
What legal principle applies when a debtor pays loan interest that was never agreed upon in writing?
Under Articles 1960 and 2154, paying unstipulated interest creates a quasi-contract of solutio indebiti requiring restitution.
If Villanueva paid P1,200,000 on a P540,000 principal loan without a written interest stipulation, how much can she recover under solutio indebiti?
Villanueva can recover the excess overpayment of P660,000 as undue interest paid without written stipulation.
Under Article 1602 of the Civil Code, when is a contract of sale presumed to be an equitable mortgage?
Choices available with full access.
Why is the deed of sale executed by Domeng in favor of Eulalia classified as an equitable mortgage rather than a true sale?
Choices available with full access.
Learn more about these topics
1. Written Interest Requirement
Under Article 1956 of the Civil Code, no interest shall be due unless it has been expressly stipulated in writing. An oral agreement or demand for interest in a contract of simple loan or mutuum is void and legally unenforceable. Consequently, any interest paid pursuant to an unwritten stipulation is considered an undue payment rather than a valid fulfillment of a civil or natural obligation.
2. Solutio Indebiti Remedy
Under Articles 1960 and 2154 of the Civil Code, if a borrower pays interest when none has been stipulated in writing, the quasi-contractual principle of solutio indebiti applies. When something is received when there is no right to demand it, and it was unduly delivered through mistake, the recipient comes under the obligation to return it. The payor may recover the full amount of undue interest paid.
3. Equitable Mortgage Presumption
Under Article 1602 of the Civil Code, a contract purporting to be an absolute sale is presumed to be an equitable mortgage when the real intention of the parties is to secure the payment of a debt or the performance of an obligation. Indicia such as executing a deed of sale to cover an employee's financial shortage demonstrate that the transaction was intended merely as security, rendering it an equitable mortgage.