When a Municipal Trial Court (MTC), pursuant to its delegated jurisdiction, renders an adverse judgment in an application for land registration, the aggrieved party’s remedy is: (1%)
(A) ordinary appeal to the Regional Trial Court
(B) petition for review on certiorari to the Supreme Court
(C) ordinary appeal to the Court of Appeals
(D) petition for review to the Court of Appeals
Suggested answer only. Not an official answer and not legal advice.
(C) ordinary appeal to the Court of Appeals is the correct answer. Under Section 34 of Batas Pambansa Blg. 129, as amended, decisions of Municipal Trial Courts in cadastral or
Unlock the full Remedial Law answers365 days of full access. GCash, Maya and card accepted.
This is not an official scoring system and carries no weight with the Supreme Court or any bar review provider. It measures how much of the suggested answer's wording your response covers, not whether your reasoning is correct. For practice only.
Quick check
Where is an adverse judgment of a Municipal Trial Court rendered pursuant to delegated land registration jurisdiction appealable?
Decisions of Municipal Trial Courts in delegated land registration cases are appealable directly to the Court of Appeals.
Under Section 34 of B.P. Blg. 129, what is the jurisdictional property value threshold for MTC delegated land registration jurisdiction?
MTCs may exercise delegated jurisdiction in land registration cases where the lot value does not exceed P100,000.
What procedural rule governs ordinary appeals to the Court of Appeals from MTC decisions in delegated land registration cases?
Rule 41 governs ordinary appeals to the Court of Appeals from judgments rendered in delegated land registration cases.
Why is an MTC decision in a delegated land registration case not appealable to the Regional Trial Court under Rule 40?
Choices available with full access.
What is the period for filing a notice of appeal from an MTC decision in a delegated land registration case?
Choices available with full access.
Learn more about these topics
1. Delegated Land Jurisdiction
Under Section 34 of Batas Pambansa Blg. 129, as amended by Republic Act No. 7691, First Level Courts may be assigned delegated jurisdiction by the Supreme Court to hear and determine cadastral or land registration cases in specific instances. This delegated jurisdiction applies where there is no controversy or contest over the lot, or where the value of the lot does not exceed One Hundred Thousand Pesos (P100,000.00). In exercising delegated jurisdiction, Municipal Trial Courts act with the same judicial authority as Regional Trial Courts handling land registration matters.
2. Appellate Remedy Rule
Decisions of Municipal Trial Courts rendered pursuant to their delegated land registration jurisdiction are appealable in the same manner as decisions of Regional Trial Courts. Under Rule 41 of the Rules of Court, an appeal from an adverse judgment of a trial court in the exercise of its original or delegated jurisdiction in land registration cases is taken to the Court of Appeals via ordinary appeal. The appeal is perfected by filing a notice of appeal with the trial court within fifteen days from notice of the judgment.
3. Direct CA Appeal
When a Municipal Trial Court exercises delegated jurisdiction in land registration cases, its decision is not appealable to the Regional Trial Court. Ordinary appeal to the Regional Trial Court under Rule 40 applies exclusively to judgments rendered by First Level Courts in the exercise of their ordinary original jurisdiction. Because delegated jurisdiction elevates the First Level Court's authority to that of an RTC in land registration cases, bypassing the RTC and appealing directly to the Court of Appeals is procedurally required.