Casper Solis graduated with a Bachelor of Laws degree from Achieve University in 2000 and took and passed the bar examinations given that same year. Casper passed the bar examinations and took the Attorney’s Oath together with other successful bar examinees on March 19, 2001 at the Philippine International Convention Center (PICC). He was scheduled to sign the Roll of Attorneys on May 24, 2001 but he misplaced the Notice to Sign the Roll of Attorneys sent by the Office of the Bar Confidant after he went home to the province for a vacation. Since taking his oath in 2001, Casper had been employed by several law firms and private corporations, mainly doing corporate and taxation work. When attending a seminar as part of his Mandatory Continuing Legal Education in 2003, Casper was unable to provide his roll number. Seven years later in 2010, Casper filed a Petition praying that he be allowed to sign the Roll of Attorneys. Casper alleged good faith, initially believing that he had already signed the Roll before entering PICC for his oath-taking on March 19, 2001.
a. Can Casper already be considered a member of the Bar and be allowed to use the title of “attorney”? Explain. (1%)
b. Did Casper commit any professional or ethical transgression for which he could be held administratively liable? (2%)
c. Will you grant Casper’s Petition to belatedly sign the Roll of Attorneys? Why? (2%)
Suggested answer only. Not an official answer and not legal advice.
[a] No, Casper is not a member of the Bar; [b] yes, he committed unauthorized practice of law; and [c] yes, his petition may be granted subject to penalties. Under Rule 138, signing the Roll of Attorneys is the ultimate act that
Unlock the full Remedial Law answers365 days of full access. GCash, Maya and card accepted.
This is not an official scoring system and carries no weight with the Supreme Court or any bar review provider. It measures how much of the suggested answer's wording your response covers, not whether your reasoning is correct. For practice only.
Quick check
What act completes admission to the Philippine Bar and authorizes the use of the title attorney?
Signing the Roll of Attorneys is the definitive act that confers bar membership and the title of attorney.
What is the legal status of a person who took the Attorney's Oath but failed to sign the Roll of Attorneys?
Taking the attorney's oath without signing the Roll does not confer membership in the Bar.
What offense is committed by someone performing legal work before signing the Roll of Attorneys?
Performing legal work prior to signing the Roll of Attorneys constitutes unauthorized practice of law.
May a petition to belatedly sign the Roll of Attorneys be granted by the Supreme Court?
Choices available with full access.
Why is Casper Solis administratively liable despite his alleged good faith belief?
Choices available with full access.
Learn more about these topics
1. Signing the Roll
Under Rule 138 of the Rules of Court, passing the bar examinations and taking the attorney's oath are insufficient to confer membership in the Philippine Bar. Signing the Roll of Attorneys is the definitive and indispensable act that completes bar admission and authorizes a person to use the title of attorney. Without signing the Roll, an individual remains a non-lawyer regardless of oath-taking or academic completion. The Roll of Attorneys serves as the official registry of all persons licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction.
2. Unauthorized Law Practice
Engaging in legal activities such as giving legal advice, drafting legal corporate documents, or handling taxation matters before signing the Roll of Attorneys constitutes unauthorized practice of law. The practice of law is a privilege strictly limited to admitted members of the Bar in good standing. Performing legal services without proper admission violates legal ethics and subjects the individual to administrative sanctions, contempt of court, or disciplinary liability for misrepresenting oneself as an attorney.
3. Belated Roll Signing
A successful bar examinee who fails to sign the Roll of Attorneys due to mistake or negligence may petition the Supreme Court for permission to sign belatedly. While good faith and lack of willful intent may be considered, unauthorized law practice committed prior to signing cannot be excused. The Supreme Court may grant the petition to sign the Roll of Attorneys subject to proper administrative penalties, fine, or suspension, ensuring respect for judicial authority and legal standards.