Differentiate between double taxation in the strict sense and in a broad sense and give an example of each. (4%)
Suggested answer only. Not an official answer and not legal advice.
Double taxation in the strict sense (direct) taxes the same subject twice by the same authority for the same purpose, while in a broad sense (indirect), it extends to impositions lacking one or more elements of
Unlock the full Commercial and Tax Law answers365 days of full access. GCash, Maya and card accepted.
This is not an official scoring system and carries no weight with the Supreme Court or any bar review provider. It measures how much of the suggested answer's wording your response covers, not whether your reasoning is correct. For practice only.
Quick check
What constitutes direct double taxation in the strict sense under Philippine tax jurisprudence?
Direct double taxation requires taxing the same subject matter twice by the same taxing authority for the same purpose within the same period.
Which Supreme Court case enumerated the six concurring elements required for direct double taxation?
CIR versus Solidbank Corporation enumerated the six concurring elements required to establish direct double taxation.
What is the legal status of indirect double taxation under the Philippine Constitution?
Indirect double taxation is constitutionally permissible unless explicitly prohibited by a tax treaty or statute.
Which of the following is an example of direct double taxation?
Choices available with full access.
Why is direct double taxation considered objectionable under Philippine constitutional principles?
Choices available with full access.
Learn more about these topics
1. Direct Double Taxation
Direct duplicate taxation, or double taxation in the strict sense, occurs when the same subject matter or property is taxed twice for the same purpose, by the same taxing authority, within the same jurisdiction, during the same taxable period, and under the same character of tax. Under Philippine tax jurisprudence, direct double taxation is constitutionally objectionable because it violates the constitutional requirement of uniformity and equal protection under the law. When all six requisite elements of direct double taxation concur, the duplicate tax imposition is invalid and unconstitutional.
2. Indirect Double Taxation
Indirect duplicate taxation, or double taxation in the broad sense, extends to tax impositions where one or more of the six requisite elements of direct double taxation are absent. For instance, indirect double taxation occurs when two different taxing authorities or jurisdictions impose separate taxes on the same income or activity, or when different types of taxes are levied on the same subject matter. Unlike direct double taxation, indirect double taxation is constitutionally permissible in the Philippines unless explicitly prohibited by a specific statutory provision or an international tax treaty.
3. Requisite Concurring Elements
In Commissioner of Internal Revenue versus Solidbank Corporation, the Supreme Court emphasized that direct double taxation requires the presence of six specific concurring elements: identical subject matter, identical purpose, same taxing authority, same jurisdiction, same tax period, and same kind or character of tax. If any of these elements is missing, such as when the taxes are levied by different taxing authorities or under different statutory tax classifications, the taxation is merely indirect and remains legally valid and enforceable.