2016 Mercantile Law, Q19

In 2015, R Corp., a domestic company that is wholly owned by Filipinos, filed its opposition to the applications for Mineral Production Sharing Agreements (MPSA) of O Corp., P Corp., and Q Corp. which were pending before the Panel of Arbitrators (POA) of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR). The three corporations wanted to undertake exploration and mining activities in the province of Isabela. The oppositor alleged that at least 60% of the capital shareholdings of the applicants are owned by B Corp., a 100% Chinese corporation, in violation of Sec. 2, Art. XII of the Constitution. The applicants countered that they are qualified corporations as defined under the Philippine Mining Act of 1995 and the Foreign Investments Act of 1991 since B Corp. holds only 40% of the capital stocks in each of them and not 60% as alleged by R Corp.
The Summary of Significant Accounting Policies statement of B Corp. reveals that the joint venture agreements of B Corp. with Sigma Corp. and Delta Corp. involve the 0 Corp., P Corp., and Q Corp. The ownership of the layered corporations and joint venture agreements show that B Corp. practically exercises control over the 0, P and Q corporations. 0, P and Q corporations contend that the control test should be applied and its MPSA applications granted. On the other hand, R Corp. argues that the “grandfather rule” should be applied. Decide with reasons. (5%)

Quick check

When does the Grandfather Rule apply to determine compliance with constitutional foreign equity limits?

Under Section 2, Article XII of the Constitution, what minimum Filipino ownership is required for MPSA applicants?

What was the landmark ruling in Narra Nickel Mining & Development Corp. versus Redmont Consolidated Mines Corp.?

Under the Control Test, how is a corporate shareholder classified if Filipinos own sixty percent of its capital stock?

Choices available with full access.

Which primary statute governs mineral exploration, development, and MPSA allocations in the Philippines?

Choices available with full access.

Unlock the full Commercial and Tax Law answers

Learn more about these topics

1. Grandfather Rule Supplemental
Under Section 2, Article XII of the 1987 Philippine Constitution and Narra Nickel Mining & Development Corp. v. Redmont Consolidated Mines Corp., the Control Test is the primary rule for determining foreign equity compliance. However, where doubt exists as to the true locus of beneficial ownership and control of corporate shares, the Grandfather Rule applies as a mandatory supplement. By tracing the ultimate nationality of stock held through corporate layers and joint venture agreements, courts determine whether the required sixty percent Filipino equity ownership is genuinely satisfied.

2. Control Test Application
Under the Foreign Investments Act of 1991 (Republic Act Number 7042), the Control Test considers a corporation Filipino-owned if at least sixty percent of its capital stock outstanding and entitled to vote is held by Philippine citizens. If a corporate shareholder is sixty percent Filipino-owned, its entire shareholding in a project company is tallied as Filipino capital. Nevertheless, when corporate layering is intentionally utilized to circumvent constitutional foreign equity restrictions, the Control Test yields to the Grandfather Rule.

3. Mining Equity Limits
Under Section 2, Article XII of the Constitution and the Philippine Mining Act of 1995 (Republic Act Number 7942), the exploration, development, and utilization of natural resources are reserved exclusively to Philippine citizens or corporations whose capital is at least sixty percent owned by Filipinos. Mineral Production Sharing Agreements (MPSA) granted to entities failing to satisfy this constitutional minimum are null and void. Corporate structures that surrender effective control to foreign entities violate constitutional mining restrictions.

About these questions and answers
The questions reproduced here are the official texts of the Philippine Bar Examinations, published by the Supreme Court. They are reproduced for study purposes.The suggested answers are the author’s own.

They are not official answers, have no connection with the Supreme Court, the Office of the Bar Confidant, or any bar review institution, and are not endorsed by any of them. Official answer keys, where released, should be preferred over anything here.Nothing on this page is legal advice, and reading it creates no lawyer-client relationship. Do not rely on any suggested answer in an actual legal matter. Consult counsel on your own facts.Suggested answers reflect the law and jurisprudence the author considers applicable as of the date shown.

Where a question comes from an earlier examination, the suggested answer applies the law as it now stands, which may differ from the law in force when the question was given, and may therefore differ from what would have been the correct answer at that time. Where the difference is material, the answer notes it.The practice scoring feature measures wording overlap with the suggested answer. It is not a grade, carries no official weight, and says nothing about whether your reasoning is sound.Errors are possible. If you find one, please tell me and I will correct it.Last reviewed: October 2026