2016 Civil Law, Q19

Brad and Angelina had a secret marriage before a pastor whose office is located in Arroceros Street, City of Manila. They paid money to the pastor who took care of all the documentation. When Angelina wanted to go to the U.S., she found out that there was no marriage license issued to them before their marriage. Since their marriage was solemnized in 1995 after the effectivity of the Family Code, Angelina filed a petition for judicial declaration of nullity on the strength of a certification by the Civil Registrar of Manila that, after a diligent and exhaustive search, the alleged marriage license indicated in the marriage certificate does not appear in the records and cannot be found.
[a] Decide the case and explain. (2.5%)
[b] In case the marriage was solemnized in 1980 before the effectivity of the Family Code, is it required that a judicial petition be filed to declare the marriage null and void? Explain. (2.5%)

Quick check

Under Articles 3 and 4 of the Family Code, what is the legal effect of the complete absence of a valid marriage license?

How may the absence of a marriage license be competently proved in a petition for judicial declaration of nullity?

For marriages solemnized in 1980 under the Civil Code, when is a judicial declaration of nullity necessary?

What rule of evidence governs a civil registrar's certification stating that no marriage license record exists?

Choices available with full access.

Why did Angelina's petition for judicial declaration of nullity of her 1995 marriage prosper?

Choices available with full access.

Unlock the full Civil Law answers

Learn more about these topics

1. Marriage License Requirement
Under Articles 3 and 4 of the Family Code, a valid marriage license is an essential formal requisite of marriage. The absence of a marriage license renders the marriage void ab initio, except in marriages of exceptional character specifically exempted by law. To establish the absence of a marriage license, a certification issued by the Local Civil Registrar stating that no marriage license appears in the civil registry records after a diligent and exhaustive search constitutes competent and sufficient evidence of its non-issuance.

2. Judicial Declaration Requirement
Under Article 40 of the Family Code, a judicial declaration of absolute nullity is required for the sole purpose of remarriage. For marriages solemnized under the Civil Code of 1950 prior to August 3, 1988, a void marriage is considered non-existent from the beginning without the necessity of a judicial decree of nullity. However, under current law, if a spouse wishes to contract a subsequent marriage, a final judgment declaring the prior marriage void ab initio remains indispensable regardless of when the prior marriage was celebrated.

3. Civil Registrar Certification
Under Section 28, Rule 132 of the Rules of Court, a written statement signed by an officer having custody of official records certifying that after diligent search no record or entry of a specified document is found is admissible as evidence that the record contains no such document. In marriage nullity proceedings, a certification from the Local Civil Registrar confirming the absence of a marriage license entry in the official registry suffices to prove that no valid license was ever issued to the contracting parties.

About these questions and answers
The questions reproduced here are the official texts of the Philippine Bar Examinations, published by the Supreme Court. They are reproduced for study purposes.The suggested answers are the author’s own.

They are not official answers, have no connection with the Supreme Court, the Office of the Bar Confidant, or any bar review institution, and are not endorsed by any of them. Official answer keys, where released, should be preferred over anything here.Nothing on this page is legal advice, and reading it creates no lawyer-client relationship. Do not rely on any suggested answer in an actual legal matter. Consult counsel on your own facts.Suggested answers reflect the law and jurisprudence the author considers applicable as of the date shown.

Where a question comes from an earlier examination, the suggested answer applies the law as it now stands, which may differ from the law in force when the question was given, and may therefore differ from what would have been the correct answer at that time. Where the difference is material, the answer notes it.The practice scoring feature measures wording overlap with the suggested answer. It is not a grade, carries no official weight, and says nothing about whether your reasoning is sound.Errors are possible. If you find one, please tell me and I will correct it.Last reviewed: October 2026