Peter, a resident of Cebu City, sent through Reliable Pera Padala (RPP) the amount of P20,000.00 to his daughter, Paula, for the payment of her tuition fee. Paula went to an RPP branch but was informed that there was no money remitted to her name. Peter inquired from RPP and was informed that there was a computer glitch and the money was credited to another person. Peter and Paula sued RPP for actual damages, moral damages and exemplary damages. The trial court ruled that there was no proof of pecuniary loss to the plaintiffs but awarded moral damages of P20,000.00 and exemplary damages of P5,000.00. On appeal, RPP questioned the award of moral and exemplary damages. Is the trial court correct in awarding moral and exemplary damages? Explain. (5%)
Suggested answer only. Not an official answer and not legal advice.
No, the trial court is not correct in awarding moral and exemplary damages. Under Articles 2220 and 2232 of the Civil Code, in breach of contract, moral damages are recoverable only when the defendant acted
Unlock the full Civil Law answers365 days of full access. GCash, Maya and card accepted.
This is not an official scoring system and carries no weight with the Supreme Court or any bar review provider. It measures how much of the suggested answer's wording your response covers, not whether your reasoning is correct. For practice only.
Quick check
Under Article 2220 of the Civil Code, when may moral damages be awarded in an action for breach of contract?
Moral damages in breach of contract require proof that the defendant acted fraudulently or in bad faith.
Under Article 2232 of the Civil Code, what conduct must be shown to justify an award of exemplary damages in contractual breach?
Exemplary damages in contracts require that the defendant acted in a wanton, fraudulent, reckless, oppressive, or malevolent manner.
How is a remittance failure caused by a computer glitch characterized under Philippine civil law on damages?
A computer glitch represents simple negligence rather than bad faith or gross negligence needed for moral and exemplary damages.
Which of the following is true regarding the recovery of moral damages under Article 2220 of the Civil Code?
Choices available with full access.
Why was the trial court incorrect in awarding moral and exemplary damages to Peter and Paula against Reliable Pera Padala?
Choices available with full access.
Learn more about these topics
1. Breach of Contract
Under Article 2220 of the Civil Code, moral damages may be awarded in breaches of contract where the defendant acted fraudulently or in bad faith. Simple negligence or inadvertent mistake in failing to perform a contractual obligation does not entitle the plaintiff to moral damages. Bad faith implies a conscious and intentional design to do a wrongful act or commit a breach of duty.
2. Exemplary Damages Requisites
Under Article 2232 of the Civil Code, in contracts and quasi-contracts, the court may award exemplary damages if the defendant acted in a wanton, fraudulent, reckless, oppressive, or malevolent manner. Exemplary or corrective damages are imposed by way of example or correction for the public good, but cannot be recovered as a matter of right without proof of wanton conduct.
3. Computer Glitch Negligence
Under Philippine civil jurisprudence, a breach of contract caused by a technical malfunction or computer glitch generally constitutes ordinary negligence rather than bad faith or gross negligence. Unless the plaintiff proves that the service provider acted with fraud, malice, or deliberate intent to cause injury, moral and exemplary damages cannot be legally sustained, and the trial court's award thereof must be set aside on appeal.