2019 Legal Ethics and Practical Exercises, Q8

A lawyer advertised in the newspaper the following:
“Expert in annulment of marriage. Fast and sure. Consult anytime.”
Is the advertisement proper? Explain. (2.5%)

Quick check

Why is advertising as an 'expert in annulment' with 'fast and sure' results prohibited under the CPRA?

Under Canon II, Section 17 of the CPRA, how is the practice of law officially characterized?

What form of information dissemination regarding legal services is permissible under current ethical rules?

Why is promising 'fast and sure' results in marriage annulment cases ethically objectionable?

Choices available with full access.

What is the primary objective of prohibiting self-laudatory and commercialized advertising by lawyers?

Choices available with full access.

Unlock the full Remedial Law answers

Learn more about these topics

1. Legal Advertising Rules
Under Canon II, Section 17 of the Code of Professional Responsibility and Accountability (CPRA), the practice of law is a profession and not a money-making trade or commercial business. While dignified, truthful, and factual information regarding a lawyer's legal services is permitted, commercialized advertising, self-laudatory statements, and solicitation of legal business are strictly prohibited. Lawyers are prohibited from advertising in a manner that degrades the legal profession, misleads the public, or reduces the administration of justice to a commercial enterprise.

2. Prohibition on Self-Praise
Self-laudatory or self-aggrandizing statements, such as claiming to be an expert or specialist in a particular field of law, are strictly barred under legal ethics rules. Such claims create an unjustified expectation of success and cannot be objectively verified by the public. Describing one's legal services as expert, superior, or unrivaled undermines the dignity of the legal profession and unfairly exploits public gullibility, constituting unethical solicitation of legal representation.

3. Guaranteeing Judicial Outcomes
A lawyer is expressly prohibited from guaranteeing specific results or promising fast and sure judicial outcomes to prospective clients. Judicial proceedings depend on facts, law, evidence, and the impartial discretion of the court, making any guarantee of success inherently deceptive and misleading. Furthermore, promising speedy annulment of marriage trivializes the sacred institution of marriage, which the State is constitutionally bound to protect, thereby violating the lawyer's fundamental ethical duties.

About these questions and answers
The questions reproduced here are the official texts of the Philippine Bar Examinations, published by the Supreme Court. They are reproduced for study purposes.The suggested answers are the author’s own.

They are not official answers, have no connection with the Supreme Court, the Office of the Bar Confidant, or any bar review institution, and are not endorsed by any of them. Official answer keys, where released, should be preferred over anything here.Nothing on this page is legal advice, and reading it creates no lawyer-client relationship. Do not rely on any suggested answer in an actual legal matter. Consult counsel on your own facts.Suggested answers reflect the law and jurisprudence the author considers applicable as of the date shown.

Where a question comes from an earlier examination, the suggested answer applies the law as it now stands, which may differ from the law in force when the question was given, and may therefore differ from what would have been the correct answer at that time. Where the difference is material, the answer notes it.The practice scoring feature measures wording overlap with the suggested answer. It is not a grade, carries no official weight, and says nothing about whether your reasoning is sound.Errors are possible. If you find one, please tell me and I will correct it.Last reviewed: October 2026