X and Y approached Mayor Z and requested him to solemnize their marriage. On the day of the ceremony, X and Y proceeded to Mayor Z’s office but he was not there. Mayor Z’s chief of staff, Mr. U, however, represented that he himself can solemnize their marriage and just have Mayor Z sign the marriage certificate when the latter comes back. Consequently, upon X and Y’s assent, Mr. U solemnized the marriage, despite his lack of authority therefor.
(a) What crime may Mr. U be charged with under the Revised Penal Code (RPC)? Explain. (2.5%)
(b) Assuming that Mayor Z signed the marriage certificate which stated that he solemnized the marriage of X and Y, what crime may Mayor Z be charged with under the RPC? Explain. (2.5%)
Suggested answer only. Not an official answer and not legal advice.
(a) Mr. U may be charged with Usurpation of Official Functions, while (b) Mayor Z may be charged with Falsification of Public Document. Under Article 177 of the RPC, Usurpation of Official Functions occurs when one performs acts pertaining to
Unlock the full Criminal Law answers365 days of full access. GCash, Maya and card accepted.
This is not an official scoring system and carries no weight with the Supreme Court or any bar review provider. It measures how much of the suggested answer's wording your response covers, not whether your reasoning is correct. For practice only.
Quick check
What crime is committed by a person who unlawfully performs a marriage ceremony without authority?
Unlawfully performing acts pertaining to a public officer constitutes Usurpation of Official Functions under Article 177.
When does a public officer commit falsification under Article 171, paragraph 2 of the RPC?
Article 171(2) penalizes a public officer for making it appear that persons participated in an act when they did not.
Can a city mayor delegate his authority to solemnize marriages to his chief of staff?
Statutory authority to solemnize marriages is personal to the public officer and cannot be delegated.
What is the legal effect on a marriage solemnized by an unauthorized chief of staff?
Choices available with full access.
How does a public officer take advantage of official position in committing falsification?
Choices available with full access.
Learn more about these topics
1. Usurpation of Authority
Under Article 177 of the Revised Penal Code, usurpation of official functions is committed by any person who performs any act pertaining to a public officer under pretense of official position without being lawfully entitled to do so. Performing a marriage ceremony without statutory authority constitutes usurpation of official functions. The law strictly penalizes unauthorized individuals who exercise functions exclusively vested in public officers, as such acts undermine public order and civil registry records.
2. Falsification by Officer
Under Article 171, paragraph 2 of the Revised Penal Code, a public officer commits falsification of a public document by taking advantage of his official position to cause it to appear that persons participated in an act or proceeding when they did not in fact participate. When a public official signs a marriage certificate falsely attesting that he personally solemnized a marriage ceremony when he was absent, he commits falsification by taking advantage of his official position.
3. Marriage Solemnization Rules
Under the Family Code of the Philippines, city and municipal mayors possess statutory authority to solemnize marriages within their territorial jurisdiction. However, this authority is personal to the elected official and cannot be delegated to subordinate staff members. Any marriage solemnized by an unauthorized person is void ab initio for lack of authority in the solemnizing officer, and falsely certifying performance of the ceremony in an official registry violates public faith.