A corporation received a letter of authority from the Bureau of Internal Revenue for 2015, which is also the corporation’s taxable year. By the end of 2019, the Bureau of Internal Revenue had yet to complete examining the corporation’s book. In January 2020, before the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Bureau of Internal Revenue issued a final assessment for deficiency taxes for 2015 based on the same letter of authority. The Bureau of Internal Revenue only found a deficiency in the income tax but did not find fraud. Is the assessment valid? Explain briefly.
Suggested answer only. Not an official answer and not legal advice.
No, the assessment issued by the Bureau of Internal Revenue is invalid. Under Section 203 of the National Internal Revenue Code (R.A. No. 8424, as amended), internal revenue taxes must be assessed within three (3) years from the deadline or
Unlock the full Commercial and Tax Law answers365 days of full access. GCash, Maya and card accepted.
This is not an official scoring system and carries no weight with the Supreme Court or any bar review provider. It measures how much of the suggested answer's wording your response covers, not whether your reasoning is correct. For practice only.
Quick check
Under Section 203 of the Tax Code, what is the general prescriptive period for the BIR to assess internal revenue taxes?
Section 203 of the Tax Code sets a general three-year prescriptive period for tax assessments.
When does the extraordinary ten-year prescriptive period for tax assessment under Section 222(a) apply?
Section 222(a) applies the ten-year period only to fraudulent returns, false returns, or non-filing.
What is the legal status of a deficiency tax assessment issued by the BIR after the three-year prescriptive period has lapsed without fraud?
An assessment issued after the expiration of the three-year prescriptive period without fraud is void due to prescription.
For taxable year 2015, if an annual income tax return was filed on April 15, 2016, when does the 3-year prescriptive period expire?
Choices available with full access.
Which statute establishes the three-year prescriptive period for assessing deficiency internal revenue taxes in the Philippines?
Choices available with full access.
Learn more about these topics
1. Assessment Prescriptive Period
Under Section 203 of the National Internal Revenue Code of 1997 (Republic Act Number 8424, as amended), internal revenue taxes must be assessed within three years after the last day prescribed by law for filing the return or from the day the return was filed, whichever comes later. The three-year prescriptive period is a mandatory statutory limitation designed to protect taxpayers from unreasonable delays and perpetual uncertainty regarding tax liabilities. Any assessment notice issued by the Bureau of Internal Revenue after the lapse of this three-year period is completely void due to prescription.
2. Fraudulent Return Exception
Under Section 222(a) of the Tax Code, an extraordinary ten-year prescriptive period applies exclusively in cases involving a false or fraudulent return filed with intent to evade tax, or a failure to file a return. To invoke this extended ten-year assessment period, the Bureau of Internal Revenue must explicitly allege and prove intentional fraud or willful tax evasion. Where the tax authority examines a taxpayer's records and finds merely a deficiency without any finding of fraud, the extraordinary ten-year period cannot extend the lapsed three-year statutory limitation.
3. Invalid Tax Assessments
An assessment issued after the statutory prescriptive period has lapsed lacks legal force and effect. Under settled tax jurisprudence, prescription deprives the Bureau of Internal Revenue of its authority to assess and collect deficiency internal revenue taxes. Even if a valid Letter of Authority was initially issued to audit the taxpayer's books, the tax authority must complete its investigation and serve the Final Assessment Notice within the mandatory three-year period. Consequently, an assessment served beyond the three-year limit without proof of fraud is void and unenforceable.