2020-21 The Law Pertaining to Private, Personal, and Commercial Relations, Q2

A corporation which owns a hospital was sued along with a physician for medical malpractice. The corporation moved to dismiss the case, arguing that it was only the physician, as the natural person, who could be the subject of any kind of suit. In other words, the corporation argued that it was not a legal person. Is the position of the corporation owning the hospital legally tenable? Explain briefly.

Quick check

Under Article 44 of the Civil Code, what is the legal nature of a corporation?

Under Article 46 of the Civil Code, what legal capacity is granted to corporate juridical persons?

Under Article 2180 of the Civil Code, on what legal basis may a hospital corporation be held vicariously liable for a physician's negligence?

Under the doctrine of corporate negligence, what direct duty does a hospital corporation owe to its patients?

Why was the hospital corporation's defense that it is not a legal person subject to suit rejected by the court?

Learn more about these topics

1. Juridical Person Capacity
Under Article 44 in relation to Article 46 of the Civil Code, corporations are recognized as juridical persons endowed with a legal personality separate and distinct from that of their individual members or officers. As juridical persons, corporations possess the full capacity to enter into contracts, acquire and possess property of all kinds, incur legal obligations, and bring or defend civil and criminal actions in courts of justice. Consequently, a corporate entity cannot claim immunity from suit on the ground that it is not a natural person.

2. Hospital Vicarious Liability
Under Article 2180 of the Civil Code, employers are held vicariously liable for damages caused by their employees acting within the scope of their assigned tasks. In medical malpractice litigation, a hospital corporation may be held vicariously liable for the negligent acts or omissions of attending physicians, nurses, and staff members when an employer-employee relationship exists between the hospital and the healthcare professional, or when the hospital holds out the physician as its agent under the doctrine of ostensible agency.

3. Corporate Negligence Doctrine
Under the doctrine of corporate negligence, a hospital corporation owes direct and independent duties to its patients, separate from the duties owed by individual physicians. These corporate duties include exercising reasonable care in selecting and retaining competent medical staff, supervising medical treatment provided within its facilities, and maintaining safe and adequate equipment and infrastructure. A hospital corporation that breaches these direct duties is independently liable for medical malpractice, irrespective of the individual liability of the attending physician.

About these questions and answers
The questions reproduced here are the official texts of the Philippine Bar Examinations, published by the Supreme Court. They are reproduced for study purposes.The suggested answers are the author’s own.

They are not official answers, have no connection with the Supreme Court, the Office of the Bar Confidant, or any bar review institution, and are not endorsed by any of them. Official answer keys, where released, should be preferred over anything here.Nothing on this page is legal advice, and reading it creates no lawyer-client relationship. Do not rely on any suggested answer in an actual legal matter. Consult counsel on your own facts.Suggested answers reflect the law and jurisprudence the author considers applicable as of the date shown.

Where a question comes from an earlier examination, the suggested answer applies the law as it now stands, which may differ from the law in force when the question was given, and may therefore differ from what would have been the correct answer at that time. Where the difference is material, the answer notes it.The practice scoring feature measures wording overlap with the suggested answer. It is not a grade, carries no official weight, and says nothing about whether your reasoning is sound.Errors are possible. If you find one, please tell me and I will correct it.Last reviewed: October 2026