2022 Civil Law, Q20

In 2017, Alma orally sold a parcel of unregistered land to the spouses Ray and Shane for Php 500,000.00. Upon receipt of the initial payment of Php 350,000.00, Alma delivered possession of the land to the spouses. Shortly thereafter, Alma died. In order to formalize the sale, Ray and Shane convinced Josie, one of Alma’s children, to sign a notarized deed of confirmation of sale. In consideration thereof, Josie received Php 150,000.00 representing the balance of the purchase price. On the strength of the notarized confirmation of sale, the spouses were able to transfer the tax declaration of the property in their names. Later, Josie died. In 2020, the surviving children of Alma discovered the oral sale of the land to Ray and Shane. They demanded the return of the property on the following grounds: (i) the oral contract of sale is void because it does not appear in a public instrument; and (ii) assuming the sale is not void, it is unenforceable under the Statute of Frauds. Ray and Shane insisted that the sale of the land to them was both valid and enforceable. Are the contentions of the heirs of Alma tenable? Explain briefly. (5 points)

Quick check

Under Articles 1356 and 1358 of the Civil Code, what is the legal status of an oral contract of sale of real property between the parties?

To what type of contracts does the Statute of Frauds under Article 1403(2) of the Civil Code exclusively apply?

Why is the Statute of Frauds inapplicable to an oral sale of land where the buyer paid part of the price and took possession?

What is the primary legal purpose of requiring real property sales to appear in a public document under Article 1358?

Choices available with full access.

Why were the contentions of Alma's heirs regarding the oral sale of land to Ray and Shane legally untenable?

Choices available with full access.

Unlock the full Civil Law answers

Learn more about these topics

1. Oral Sale Validity
Under Articles 1356 and 1358 of the Civil Code, a contract of sale over real property is consensual and perfected by mere consent. The requirement that contracts transmitting real rights over immovable property must appear in a public document is purely for convenience and enforceability against third persons, not for validity. An oral contract of sale covering land remains completely valid and binding between the contracting parties and their legal successors-in-interest, notwithstanding the lack of a notarized public instrument.

2. Statute of Frauds
Under Article 1403(2) of the Civil Code, the Statute of Frauds requires certain contracts, including agreements for the sale of real property, to be evidenced by a written note or memorandum to be enforceable in court. However, the Statute of Frauds applies exclusively to executory contracts where neither party has performed their obligation. It has no application to contracts that have been partially or totally executed, as physical delivery of possession or acceptance of payment takes the agreement out of the statute's operation.

3. Partially Executed Contracts
Partial execution of an oral land sale removes the agreement from the prohibition of the Statute of Frauds. When the vendor delivers physical possession of the land to the vendees upon receiving initial payment, and the remaining balance of the purchase price is subsequently paid in full, the contract becomes fully executed. Equity prevents the vendor's legal heirs from invoking the Statute of Frauds to repudiate a transaction where the deceased vendor received substantial benefits and surrendered physical dominion over the property.

About these questions and answers
The questions reproduced here are the official texts of the Philippine Bar Examinations, published by the Supreme Court. They are reproduced for study purposes.The suggested answers are the author’s own.

They are not official answers, have no connection with the Supreme Court, the Office of the Bar Confidant, or any bar review institution, and are not endorsed by any of them. Official answer keys, where released, should be preferred over anything here.Nothing on this page is legal advice, and reading it creates no lawyer-client relationship. Do not rely on any suggested answer in an actual legal matter. Consult counsel on your own facts.Suggested answers reflect the law and jurisprudence the author considers applicable as of the date shown.

Where a question comes from an earlier examination, the suggested answer applies the law as it now stands, which may differ from the law in force when the question was given, and may therefore differ from what would have been the correct answer at that time. Where the difference is material, the answer notes it.The practice scoring feature measures wording overlap with the suggested answer. It is not a grade, carries no official weight, and says nothing about whether your reasoning is sound.Errors are possible. If you find one, please tell me and I will correct it.Last reviewed: October 2026